Systematic assessment of diverse RNA modifications using nanopore direct RNA sequencing

While nanopore direct RNA sequencing has substantially advanced transcriptomics, its detection of RNA modifications remains primarily focused on abundant biological base modifications. However, therapeutic RNAs employ a diverse catalog of modifications, including base, sugar, and backbone modifications, to enhance stability and pharmacological properties. To address this gap, we systematically evaluated a set of therapeutically relevant modifications [phosphorothioate (PS)], sugar [2'-O-methylation (2'OMe), 2'-Fluoro (2'F), locked nucleic acid (LNA), 2'-O-(2'-methoxyethyl) (2'MOE)], and base [N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU), and 5-iodocytidine (5iodoC)] using direct RNA nanopore sequencing. Modifications were systematically analyzed using basecall errors, raw current signals, and modification-aware basecalling models. Ribose modifications, m1Ψ, and 5moU induced significant error rate increases and noticeable current alterations, whereas 2'OMe and 2'MOE affected dwell time adjacent to the pore. In contrast, PS linkages produced only slight current alterations without increasing basecalling errors. We further evaluated modification-aware basecallers for 2'OMe and m5C. While these tools can distinguish modification types, they are limited by poor quantification accuracy and high local error rates, especially for 2'OMe. This study establishes a critical performance baseline, clarifying the current capability and limitations of nanopore technology for the analysis of therapeutically relevant RNA modifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag411
Primary Topic
RNA modifications and cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic assessment of diverse RNA modifications using nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Alexandre Goyon, Xinqi Kang, Kelly Zhang, William Stephenson
Nucleic Acids Research
RNA modifications and cancer
article

Systematic assessment of diverse RNA modifications using nanopore direct RNA sequencing

Alexandre Goyon, Xinqi Kang, Kelly Zhang, William Stephenson
article en

Abstract

While nanopore direct RNA sequencing has substantially advanced transcriptomics, its detection of RNA modifications remains primarily focused on abundant biological base modifications. However, therapeutic RNAs employ a diverse catalog of modifications, including base, sugar, and backbone modifications, to enhance stability and pharmacological properties. To address this gap, we systematically evaluated a set of therapeutically relevant modifications [phosphorothioate (PS)], sugar [2'-O-methylation (2'OMe), 2'-Fluoro (2'F), locked nucleic acid (LNA), 2'-O-(2'-methoxyethyl) (2'MOE)], and base [N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), 5-methoxyuridine (5moU), and 5-iodocytidine (5iodoC)] using direct RNA nanopore sequencing. Modifications were systematically analyzed using basecall errors, raw current signals, and modification-aware basecalling models. Ribose modifications, m1Ψ, and 5moU induced significant error rate increases and noticeable current alterations, whereas 2'OMe and 2'MOE affected dwell time adjacent to the pore. In contrast, PS linkages produced only slight current alterations without increasing basecalling errors. We further evaluated modification-aware basecallers for 2'OMe and m5C. While these tools can distinguish modification types, they are limited by poor quantification accuracy and high local error rates, especially for 2'OMe. This study establishes a critical performance baseline, clarifying the current capability and limitations of nanopore technology for the analysis of therapeutically relevant RNA modifications.

Nucleic Acids ResearchVol. 54(8)
Synthetic Genomics (United States) (US), Genomic Health (United States) (US)
Genentech
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
RNA modifications and cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.