Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a global health burden, with high morbidity and mortality largely driven by late-stage diagnosis and heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Reliable biomarkers are needed to improve early detection, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. This study evaluates the diagnostic and prognostic value of chemokines in HNCs and identifies candidates with clinical relevance. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on 28 March 2026 across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Observational studies involving patients or biological samples with confirmed HNCs were included if they evaluated chemokines as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for prognostic studies and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for diagnostic studies. Meta-analyses were performed for chemokines evaluated in ≥3 studies using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Results: Forty-four studies encompassing 7294 participants were included. Prognostic findings were heterogeneous across biomarkers. MIP-3α demonstrated consistently significant associations with poorer survival outcomes. In contrast, IL-8, CXCL10, and CXCR4 showed inconsistent or predominantly non-significant associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC). For diagnostic performance, IL-8, in saliva, demonstrated relatively high sensitivity and specificity for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Chemerin showed high diagnostic accuracy, although evidence remains limited. Conclusions: Certain chemokines show potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in HNCs. However, heterogeneity across tumor types, samples, and methodologies limits evidence. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to validate their clinical utility in risk stratification and personalized management of HNCs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091437
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohammed Imad Malki, Mohamed Elhadary, Raneem Alsheikh, Dima Nasrallah et al.
Cancers
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mohammed Imad Malki, Mohamed Elhadary, Raneem Alsheikh, Dima Nasrallah, Ahmed Arabi, Ahmad Hamdan, Deemah Assami, Ibrahim Elmakaty
article en

Abstract

Background: Head and neck cancers (HNCs) represent a global health burden, with high morbidity and mortality largely driven by late-stage diagnosis and heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Reliable biomarkers are needed to improve early detection, prognostic stratification, and therapeutic decision-making. This study evaluates the diagnostic and prognostic value of chemokines in HNCs and identifies candidates with clinical relevance. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on 28 March 2026 across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO. Observational studies involving patients or biological samples with confirmed HNCs were included if they evaluated chemokines as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for prognostic studies and the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for diagnostic studies. Meta-analyses were performed for chemokines evaluated in ≥3 studies using the inverse-variance heterogeneity model. Results: Forty-four studies encompassing 7294 participants were included. Prognostic findings were heterogeneous across biomarkers. MIP-3α demonstrated consistently significant associations with poorer survival outcomes. In contrast, IL-8, CXCL10, and CXCR4 showed inconsistent or predominantly non-significant associations with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional control (LRC). For diagnostic performance, IL-8, in saliva, demonstrated relatively high sensitivity and specificity for oral squamous cell carcinoma. Chemerin showed high diagnostic accuracy, although evidence remains limited. Conclusions: Certain chemokines show potential as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in HNCs. However, heterogeneity across tumor types, samples, and methodologies limits evidence. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to validate their clinical utility in risk stratification and personalized management of HNCs.

CancersVol. 18(9)
Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.