Comparative Study on the Fire Suppression Performance of Water Mist Systems and Gas-Based Automatic Extinguishing Devices under Nuclear Power Plant Cabinet Fire Conditions

This study compared the fire suppression performance of gas-based automatic extinguishing systems (HFC-125 and FK-5-1-12) and a water mist system for localized cabinet fires in nuclear power plants. Fire tests using n-heptane and diesel were conducted under simulated cabinet fire conditions, and the suppression performance was evaluated based on the activation temperature, extinguishing time, and reignition behavior. The gas-based systems extinguished fires within 11~17 s, whereas the water mist system achieved a comparable performance with extinguishing times of 15~18 s. No reignition was observed in any test case. These findings indicate that the water mist system is a feasible alternative for localized cabinet fire suppression, offering reduced dependency on enclosure conditions compared with gas-based systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Science and Engineering
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.ad868c89
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study on the Fire Suppression Performance of Water Mist Systems and Gas-Based Automatic Extinguishing Devices under Nuclear Power Plant Cabinet Fire Conditions

박세훈, Jihee Lee, Seok Jung, Heejun Kwon
Fire Science and Engineering
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

Comparative Study on the Fire Suppression Performance of Water Mist Systems and Gas-Based Automatic Extinguishing Devices under Nuclear Power Plant Cabinet Fire Conditions

박세훈, Jihee Lee, Seok Jung, Heejun Kwon
article en

Abstract

This study compared the fire suppression performance of gas-based automatic extinguishing systems (HFC-125 and FK-5-1-12) and a water mist system for localized cabinet fires in nuclear power plants. Fire tests using n-heptane and diesel were conducted under simulated cabinet fire conditions, and the suppression performance was evaluated based on the activation temperature, extinguishing time, and reignition behavior. The gas-based systems extinguished fires within 11~17 s, whereas the water mist system achieved a comparable performance with extinguishing times of 15~18 s. No reignition was observed in any test case. These findings indicate that the water mist system is a feasible alternative for localized cabinet fire suppression, offering reduced dependency on enclosure conditions compared with gas-based systems.

Fire Science and EngineeringVol. 40(2)
Yahoo (United Kingdom) (GB), Health Strat (Kenya) (KE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.