Environmental and spatial factors driving beta diversity in freshwater communities: a systematic review

Abstract The structuring of aquatic communities depends on a set of factors, such as abiotic variables, biotic interactions, and spatial processes related to species dispersal. However, the influence of these predictors varies across different spatial scales, organism groups, and ecosystems. Environmental and spatial processes are key drivers of beta diversity, and therefore this review aimed to synthesize the literature on the relative importance of environmental and spatial factors driving the beta diversity of metacommunities in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. This work focused on studies based on dissimilarity matrices, employing the techniques of distance-based redundancy analysis and variation partitioning. Forty-five articles were selected and analyzed, and the data were categorized according to organism groups, ecosystem types, spatial extents, diversity facets, and beta diversity components. The results showed that, across the entire dataset, environmental factors explained a median of 8% of the dissimilarity, while spatial factors explained 4%. Both factors contributed to the variation, but environmental factors were more important across all organism groups, ecosystem types, and beta diversity facets. The components of species replacement/turnover and total beta diversity were also predominantly explained by environmental factors, whereas the richness difference and nestedness were more strongly associated with spatial factors. The influence of environmental and spatial factors varied across different spatial scales. These findings reinforce the importance of considering multiple ecological categories and scales when studying metacommunities. Additionally, they highlight the need to incorporate other factors, such as temporal dynamics and biotic interactions, in metacommunity studies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Aquatic Sciences
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-026-01303-5
Primary Topic
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental and spatial factors driving beta diversity in freshwater communities: a systematic review

N.J. Silva, Fábio Amodêo Lansac‐Tôha, Fernando Miranda Lansac‐Tôha, Tatiane Mantovano
Aquatic Sciences
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
article

Environmental and spatial factors driving beta diversity in freshwater communities: a systematic review

N.J. Silva, Fábio Amodêo Lansac‐Tôha, Fernando Miranda Lansac‐Tôha, Tatiane Mantovano
article en

Abstract

Abstract The structuring of aquatic communities depends on a set of factors, such as abiotic variables, biotic interactions, and spatial processes related to species dispersal. However, the influence of these predictors varies across different spatial scales, organism groups, and ecosystems. Environmental and spatial processes are key drivers of beta diversity, and therefore this review aimed to synthesize the literature on the relative importance of environmental and spatial factors driving the beta diversity of metacommunities in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. This work focused on studies based on dissimilarity matrices, employing the techniques of distance-based redundancy analysis and variation partitioning. Forty-five articles were selected and analyzed, and the data were categorized according to organism groups, ecosystem types, spatial extents, diversity facets, and beta diversity components. The results showed that, across the entire dataset, environmental factors explained a median of 8% of the dissimilarity, while spatial factors explained 4%. Both factors contributed to the variation, but environmental factors were more important across all organism groups, ecosystem types, and beta diversity facets. The components of species replacement/turnover and total beta diversity were also predominantly explained by environmental factors, whereas the richness difference and nestedness were more strongly associated with spatial factors. The influence of environmental and spatial factors varied across different spatial scales. These findings reinforce the importance of considering multiple ecological categories and scales when studying metacommunities. Additionally, they highlight the need to incorporate other factors, such as temporal dynamics and biotic interactions, in metacommunity studies.

Aquatic SciencesVol. 88(3)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universidade Estadual de Maringá
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.