The Formation and Development of Ancient Sanskrit and Hiragana from a Cultural History Perspective

This study examines the formation and development of Sanskrit and Hiragana in ancient times through a historical-cultural lens, clarifying the dialectical relationship between writing systems and social practices and power structures, aiming to fill an academic gap in a comprehensive approach to these two writing systems. Applying the ideological writing model, combined with the power and language theories of Michel Foucault and Saussure, to analyze writing as a cultural institution linked to a specific historical context, the study highlights the contrasts and similarities in the social roles of the two writing systems: Sanskrit developed from the oral Vedic tradition into a "sacred" language system, standardized to maintain the intellectual and ritual power of the Brahmin class, serving as a tool of orthodox religion. Conversely, Hiragana is a product of localization linked to a feminine semiotic space. If Sanskrit represented the standardization and power of masculinity, then Hiragana represented the expression of emotions, private life, and resistance against the dominance of Chinese writing, thereby affirming indigenous cultural identity. In short, the evolution of these two writing systems is vivid evidence that writing is both a tool for communication and a means of constructing and maintaining social order.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2026-04-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20261402.21
Primary Topic
Indian and Buddhist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Formation and Development of Ancient Sanskrit and Hiragana from a Cultural History Perspective

Le Van Nhu, Nguyen Ha, Cao Nhi, Nguyen Giang
Humanities and Social Sciences
Indian and Buddhist Studies
article

The Formation and Development of Ancient Sanskrit and Hiragana from a Cultural History Perspective

Le Van Nhu, Nguyen Ha, Cao Nhi, Nguyen Giang
article en

Abstract

This study examines the formation and development of Sanskrit and Hiragana in ancient times through a historical-cultural lens, clarifying the dialectical relationship between writing systems and social practices and power structures, aiming to fill an academic gap in a comprehensive approach to these two writing systems. Applying the ideological writing model, combined with the power and language theories of Michel Foucault and Saussure, to analyze writing as a cultural institution linked to a specific historical context, the study highlights the contrasts and similarities in the social roles of the two writing systems: Sanskrit developed from the oral Vedic tradition into a "sacred" language system, standardized to maintain the intellectual and ritual power of the Brahmin class, serving as a tool of orthodox religion. Conversely, Hiragana is a product of localization linked to a feminine semiotic space. If Sanskrit represented the standardization and power of masculinity, then Hiragana represented the expression of emotions, private life, and resistance against the dominance of Chinese writing, thereby affirming indigenous cultural identity. In short, the evolution of these two writing systems is vivid evidence that writing is both a tool for communication and a means of constructing and maintaining social order.

Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 14(2)
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Indian and Buddhist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.