From Purpose to Persistence: How Intentional Introductions by Humans Influence Ecological Niches of Non‐Native Plants

ABSTRACT Aim The intentional or unintentional transport of non‐native plants is key to overcoming geographic barriers. However, it remains unclear whether such introduction pathways associate with overcoming environmental barriers, which is key for successful invasion. Here, we test how intentionality of introduction associates with niche breadth and niche harshness. Location Europe. Time Period 1914–2020. Major Taxa Studied 220 plant species. Methods Across > 60,000 invaded vegetation plots, we tested whether intentionality of introduction (intentional, unintentional, or both) and characteristics of non‐native plants (native climatic niche breadth, growth form, dispersal syndrome, height, residence time) were associated with their niche breadth, quantified through habitats, climate, and co‐occurring flora. We tested how the intentionality of introduction was associated with environmental harshness (drought, salinity, oligotrophy, and elevation), while accounting for land‐cover and habitat types. Results Non‐native plants introduced both intentionally and unintentionally had a broader habitat range, compared to non‐native plants introduced only unintentionally. A broad climatic niche in the native range was associated with a broader invaded climatic niche, while a long residence time was associated with broader habitat and biotic niches. Intentional introduction was associated with the invasion of dry habitats and forests, whereas unintentional introduction was linked to the invasion of saline, high‐elevation, and disturbed environments. Main Conclusions In addition to triggering invasions, the type of process responsible for introduction can partly explain how non‐native plants overcome environmental barriers in the invaded range. The intentionality of introduction was associated with niche breadth only in terms of habitat range, while the association with niche harshness depended on the type of stress, which highlights the importance of integrative niche assessments. The relationship between intentionality of introduction and the invaded niche could relate to intentionality‐specific differences in biological attributes (environmental tolerance, dispersal capacity, and preference for disturbance) and the introduction process (propagule pressure and residence time).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70245
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Purpose to Persistence: How Intentional Introductions by Humans Influence Ecological Niches of Non‐Native Plants

Fabrizio Buldrini, Pauline Delbosc, Gianmaria Bonari, Joan Pino et al.
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

From Purpose to Persistence: How Intentional Introductions by Humans Influence Ecological Niches of Non‐Native Plants

Fabrizio Buldrini, Pauline Delbosc, Gianmaria Bonari, Joan Pino, Marc Riera, Irena Axmanová, Llorenç Sáez, Mária Šibíková, Remigiusz Pielech, Idoia Biurrun, Ute Jandt, Yolanda Melero, Milan Chytrý, Florian Jansen, Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro, Petr Pyšek, Jürgen Dengler, Fabio Attorre
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim The intentional or unintentional transport of non‐native plants is key to overcoming geographic barriers. However, it remains unclear whether such introduction pathways associate with overcoming environmental barriers, which is key for successful invasion. Here, we test how intentionality of introduction associates with niche breadth and niche harshness. Location Europe. Time Period 1914–2020. Major Taxa Studied 220 plant species. Methods Across > 60,000 invaded vegetation plots, we tested whether intentionality of introduction (intentional, unintentional, or both) and characteristics of non‐native plants (native climatic niche breadth, growth form, dispersal syndrome, height, residence time) were associated with their niche breadth, quantified through habitats, climate, and co‐occurring flora. We tested how the intentionality of introduction was associated with environmental harshness (drought, salinity, oligotrophy, and elevation), while accounting for land‐cover and habitat types. Results Non‐native plants introduced both intentionally and unintentionally had a broader habitat range, compared to non‐native plants introduced only unintentionally. A broad climatic niche in the native range was associated with a broader invaded climatic niche, while a long residence time was associated with broader habitat and biotic niches. Intentional introduction was associated with the invasion of dry habitats and forests, whereas unintentional introduction was linked to the invasion of saline, high‐elevation, and disturbed environments. Main Conclusions In addition to triggering invasions, the type of process responsible for introduction can partly explain how non‐native plants overcome environmental barriers in the invaded range. The intentionality of introduction was associated with niche breadth only in terms of habitat range, while the association with niche harshness depended on the type of stress, which highlights the importance of integrative niche assessments. The relationship between intentionality of introduction and the invaded niche could relate to intentionality‐specific differences in biological attributes (environmental tolerance, dispersal capacity, and preference for disturbance) and the introduction process (propagule pressure and residence time).

Global Ecology and BiogeographyVol. 35(5)
University of Siena (IT), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Jagiellonian University (PL), Universidad de Oviedo (ES), University of the Basque Country (ES), University of Milan (IT), Charles University (CZ), Masaryk University (CZ), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Institute of Botany of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Biodiversity Research Institute (US), Centre for Research on Ecology and Forestry Applications (ES), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES), Conservatoire Botanique National Méditerranéen de Porquerolles (FR), University of Rostock (DE), University of Bayreuth (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Generalitat de Catalunya, Akademie Věd České Republiky
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.