Efficacy and Safety of Regulatory Vascular Polypeptides in Chronic Venous Diseases of the Lower Extremities: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic agent derived from regulatory polypeptides sourced from bovine vascular tissue in combination therapy for patients diagnosed with chronic venous diseases (CVD) in the lower extremities. Material and methods. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 190 patients with CVD, randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 received a combination of vascular polypeptides and troxerutin (n=95), while Group 2 received placebo with troxerutin (n=95). The total duration of the observation period extended to 137 days. This period included five scheduled visits: Visit 1 at the start of therapy; Visit 2 after 14±2 days of treatment; Visit 3 at the end of the treatment (35±2 days); Visit 4 30±3 days after the end of the treatment; and Visit 5 90±5 days after the end of the treatment. Efficacy was evaluated using the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and pain and discomfort were quantified using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Quality-of-life outcomes were measured using the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire, and changes in malleolar circumference were recorded. Safety was assessed by the frequency and types of adverse events. Results. At Visit 4, the mean VCSS in Group 1 was 2.33±1.31, compared to 3.24±1.62 in Group 2, resulting in a mean difference of –0.92 (95% CI from –1.34 to –0.50; p<0.001), confirming the hypothesis of the efficacy of the combination therapy. At Visit 4, a clinically significant improvement in quality of life, defined as a reduction of 5 points or more on the CIVIQ-20, was observed in 93.7% of patients in Group 1, compared with 75.8% in Group 2 (p=0.0006). This effect persisted at Visit 5, with improvements noted in 92.6% in Group 1 compared to 78.9% in Group 2 (p=0.007). Additionally, a reduction of at least 1 point in pain intensity on the VAS was observed in 91.6% of patients in Group 1, compared with 74.7% in Group 2 (p=0.002). Malleolar circumference exhibited a greater reduction in Group 1 at Visit 5 (0.76±0.79 cm vs. 0.46±0.64 cm; p=0.004). No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. Conclusions. Incorporating bovine regulatory vascular polypeptides into a combined therapeutic approach effectively alleviates symptoms of chronic venous disease and enhances quality of life while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Venous Disorders
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17116/flebo20262002189
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and Safety of Regulatory Vascular Polypeptides in Chronic Venous Diseases of the Lower Extremities: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

A.G. Burenin, I A Suсhkov, S V Sapelkin, A.V. Chupin et al.
Journal of Venous Disorders
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
article

Efficacy and Safety of Regulatory Vascular Polypeptides in Chronic Venous Diseases of the Lower Extremities: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

A.G. Burenin, I A Suсhkov, S V Sapelkin, A.V. Chupin, A.A. Kamaev
article en

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a therapeutic agent derived from regulatory polypeptides sourced from bovine vascular tissue in combination therapy for patients diagnosed with chronic venous diseases (CVD) in the lower extremities. Material and methods. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involved 190 patients with CVD, randomly assigned to two groups. Group 1 received a combination of vascular polypeptides and troxerutin (n=95), while Group 2 received placebo with troxerutin (n=95). The total duration of the observation period extended to 137 days. This period included five scheduled visits: Visit 1 at the start of therapy; Visit 2 after 14±2 days of treatment; Visit 3 at the end of the treatment (35±2 days); Visit 4 30±3 days after the end of the treatment; and Visit 5 90±5 days after the end of the treatment. Efficacy was evaluated using the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and pain and discomfort were quantified using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Quality-of-life outcomes were measured using the CIVIQ-20 questionnaire, and changes in malleolar circumference were recorded. Safety was assessed by the frequency and types of adverse events. Results. At Visit 4, the mean VCSS in Group 1 was 2.33±1.31, compared to 3.24±1.62 in Group 2, resulting in a mean difference of –0.92 (95% CI from –1.34 to –0.50; p<0.001), confirming the hypothesis of the efficacy of the combination therapy. At Visit 4, a clinically significant improvement in quality of life, defined as a reduction of 5 points or more on the CIVIQ-20, was observed in 93.7% of patients in Group 1, compared with 75.8% in Group 2 (p=0.0006). This effect persisted at Visit 5, with improvements noted in 92.6% in Group 1 compared to 78.9% in Group 2 (p=0.007). Additionally, a reduction of at least 1 point in pain intensity on the VAS was observed in 91.6% of patients in Group 1, compared with 74.7% in Group 2 (p=0.002). Malleolar circumference exhibited a greater reduction in Group 1 at Visit 5 (0.76±0.79 cm vs. 0.46±0.64 cm; p=0.004). No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. Conclusions. Incorporating bovine regulatory vascular polypeptides into a combined therapeutic approach effectively alleviates symptoms of chronic venous disease and enhances quality of life while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Journal of Venous DisordersVol. 20(2)
JPT Peptide Technologies (Germany) (DE), Peptide Protein Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Ryazan State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.