Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cutting pain, not just gallbladder (systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials)

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for gallstone disease, but postoperative pain remains a challenge. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique; however, its comparative efficacy versus established methods such as transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), port-site infiltration (PSI), or no block (NB) is not fully clarified. Materials and methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Thirty-six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2018 and 2025, including adult patients who had LC were analyzed. ESPB was compared with TAPB (12 RCTs), PSI (5 RCTs), and NB (24 RCTs) with respect to pain scores, opioid consumption, time to rescue analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl use, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Fixed- or random-effects models were used according to heterogeneity ( I 2 threshold 50%). Results: ESPB significantly reduced postoperative pain at rest and on movement compared with NB at all time points, with the greatest effect observed at 1–2 hours (MD: −1.82; P < 0.00001). Compared with TAPB, ESPB yielded lower resting pain at 1–2 and 6 hours, with modest differences at 12 and 24 hours. ESPB also demonstrated superiority over PSI at 12 hours but not at earlier or later intervals. Opioid consumption within 24 hours was markedly lower in the ESPB group (reductions of approximately 1.98–5.33 mg morphine equivalents), and time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged by 117–214 minutes depending on the comparator. ESPB further reduced intraoperative fentanyl use and significantly decreased PONV incidence versus TAPB, PSI, and NB. Conclusions: ESPB provides superior analgesia with reduced opioid consumption after LC, with additional benefits of prolonged pain relief and lower PONV rates. It should be considered an effective component of multimodal pain management in this setting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000004985
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cutting pain, not just gallbladder (systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials)

Serge Chooklin, S.S. Chuklin
International Journal of Surgery
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: cutting pain, not just gallbladder (systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials)

Serge Chooklin, S.S. Chuklin
article en

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for gallstone disease, but postoperative pain remains a challenge. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique; however, its comparative efficacy versus established methods such as transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), port-site infiltration (PSI), or no block (NB) is not fully clarified. Materials and methods: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines. Thirty-six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2018 and 2025, including adult patients who had LC were analyzed. ESPB was compared with TAPB (12 RCTs), PSI (5 RCTs), and NB (24 RCTs) with respect to pain scores, opioid consumption, time to rescue analgesia, intraoperative fentanyl use, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Fixed- or random-effects models were used according to heterogeneity ( I 2 threshold 50%). Results: ESPB significantly reduced postoperative pain at rest and on movement compared with NB at all time points, with the greatest effect observed at 1–2 hours (MD: −1.82; P < 0.00001). Compared with TAPB, ESPB yielded lower resting pain at 1–2 and 6 hours, with modest differences at 12 and 24 hours. ESPB also demonstrated superiority over PSI at 12 hours but not at earlier or later intervals. Opioid consumption within 24 hours was markedly lower in the ESPB group (reductions of approximately 1.98–5.33 mg morphine equivalents), and time to first rescue analgesia was prolonged by 117–214 minutes depending on the comparator. ESPB further reduced intraoperative fentanyl use and significantly decreased PONV incidence versus TAPB, PSI, and NB. Conclusions: ESPB provides superior analgesia with reduced opioid consumption after LC, with additional benefits of prolonged pain relief and lower PONV rates. It should be considered an effective component of multimodal pain management in this setting.

International Journal of Surgery
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.