Seismic Performance Test and Case Analysis of Typical Steel–Concrete Composite Members

Steel–concrete composite components exhibit significant advantages, including reliable mechanical performance, rapid construction, cost efficiency, and low environmental impact. Existing studies on their seismic behavior have mainly focused on developing novel connection forms and enhancing joint zone strength, while systematic investigations into the post-earthquake axial compression behavior and failure mechanisms of composite joints remain limited. To address this gap, this study investigates the mechanical performance of steel–concrete composite components under strong seismic and post-earthquake conditions. Seismic damage characteristics are first analyzed based on representative case studies of conventional steel–concrete columns. Subsequently, low-cycle reversed loading tests followed by post-earthquake axial compression tests are conducted on seven beam–column joints with varying damage levels, and the damage evolution and seismic performance of joint zones under different structural configurations are systematically evaluated. In addition, the seismic performance of steel–concrete composite shear walls is further validated. The results provide a scientific basis for the seismic design, post-earthquake assessment, and repair of steel–concrete composite structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16091808
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Performance Test and Case Analysis of Typical Steel–Concrete Composite Members

Wei Ding, Suizi Jia, Shilin Wei
Buildings
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Seismic Performance Test and Case Analysis of Typical Steel–Concrete Composite Members

Wei Ding, Suizi Jia, Shilin Wei
article en

Abstract

Steel–concrete composite components exhibit significant advantages, including reliable mechanical performance, rapid construction, cost efficiency, and low environmental impact. Existing studies on their seismic behavior have mainly focused on developing novel connection forms and enhancing joint zone strength, while systematic investigations into the post-earthquake axial compression behavior and failure mechanisms of composite joints remain limited. To address this gap, this study investigates the mechanical performance of steel–concrete composite components under strong seismic and post-earthquake conditions. Seismic damage characteristics are first analyzed based on representative case studies of conventional steel–concrete columns. Subsequently, low-cycle reversed loading tests followed by post-earthquake axial compression tests are conducted on seven beam–column joints with varying damage levels, and the damage evolution and seismic performance of joint zones under different structural configurations are systematically evaluated. In addition, the seismic performance of steel–concrete composite shear walls is further validated. The results provide a scientific basis for the seismic design, post-earthquake assessment, and repair of steel–concrete composite structures.

BuildingsVol. 16(9)
Guizhou University (CN), China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seismic Performance Test and Case Analysis of Typical Steel–Concrete Composite Members — Wei Ding, Suizi Jia, et al. · Buildings (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS