The European Union’s Approach to Strategic Technology Governance: The Case of AI

Strategic technologies have gained pivotal significance in the context of a return to great power politics, and with it, questions about their governance and regulation. These global develop- ments have particular resonance for the European Union (EU)— the world’s largest trading bloc with a strong commitment to a rules-based international system and far-reaching regulatory powers over its internal market. The changing global landscape raises pertinent questions about the EU’s response to these challenges. Traditionally, the EU has approached the govern- ance of technologies from the perspective of their economic and societal impact. However, from the early 2020s onwards, in line with the broader turn towards geopoliticization, there has been an increasing recognition of the strategic and security dimensions of new technologies. This article focuses on the analysis of the EU’s regulatory activity in the area of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in order to develop an understanding of the way in which the EU positions itself in this regulatory space within the evolving global context. Towards this aim, the article conceptualises possible regulatory activity along the lines of four analytical dimensions: the degree of institutionalised inter- national cooperation, the legal character of the governance adopted, the respective roles of the public and private sectors and the relative influence of international and national interest drivers. The EU’s approach to strategic technology governance is then mapped and categorised along these dimensions. Based on the findings, the article reflects on its conclusion on the EU’s capacity to navigate the tensions between internal preferences, its global governance aspirations and geopolitical competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2026.2661676
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Union’s Approach to Strategic Technology Governance: The Case of AI

Flavia Lucenti, Sophie Vanhoonacker, Thomas Christiansen
Geopolitics
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

The European Union’s Approach to Strategic Technology Governance: The Case of AI

Flavia Lucenti, Sophie Vanhoonacker, Thomas Christiansen
article en

Abstract

Strategic technologies have gained pivotal significance in the context of a return to great power politics, and with it, questions about their governance and regulation. These global develop- ments have particular resonance for the European Union (EU)— the world’s largest trading bloc with a strong commitment to a rules-based international system and far-reaching regulatory powers over its internal market. The changing global landscape raises pertinent questions about the EU’s response to these challenges. Traditionally, the EU has approached the govern- ance of technologies from the perspective of their economic and societal impact. However, from the early 2020s onwards, in line with the broader turn towards geopoliticization, there has been an increasing recognition of the strategic and security dimensions of new technologies. This article focuses on the analysis of the EU’s regulatory activity in the area of Artificial Intelligence (AI), in order to develop an understanding of the way in which the EU positions itself in this regulatory space within the evolving global context. Towards this aim, the article conceptualises possible regulatory activity along the lines of four analytical dimensions: the degree of institutionalised inter- national cooperation, the legal character of the governance adopted, the respective roles of the public and private sectors and the relative influence of international and national interest drivers. The EU’s approach to strategic technology governance is then mapped and categorised along these dimensions. Based on the findings, the article reflects on its conclusion on the EU’s capacity to navigate the tensions between internal preferences, its global governance aspirations and geopolitical competition.

Geopolitics
Maastricht University (NL), Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.