Research note: Gentle versus severe feather pecking: effects of synbiotic feed supplementation under chronic stress in laying hens

Feather pecking in laying hens is a complex behavior influenced by stress and the gut microbiota, with severe feather pecking (SFP) posing a major welfare concern and gentle feather pecking (GFP) representing a non-injurious, socially mediated behavior. This study investigated the effects of a commercial synbiotic supplement on SFP, GFP, and feather damage (FD) in hens exposed to chronic social and physical stressors. A total of 394 White Leghorn hens from high, low, and unselected feather pecking lines were housed in twelve floor pens. Pens received either synbiotic-supplemented or control feed, and within each feed treatment half of the pens were exposed to stressors including social mixing, perch removal, and litter reduction over a four-week period. Behavioral observations and plumage assessments were conducted before and after stress exposure. Synbiotic supplementation did not significantly affect SFP or FD scores. However, stressors alone doubled SFP rates and tripled the likelihood of severe FD. GFP was significantly influenced by an interaction between feed and stress treatments; however post hoc comparisons indicated a trend toward higher GFP in stressed synbiotic-fed hens compared with their non-stressed counterparts, with no differences observed in control birds. These findings indicate that synbiotic supplementation via feed did not mitigate stress-induced SFP or FD, while subtle differences in GFP expression highlight the sensitivity of non-injurious pecking behaviors to behavioral context under stress. Overall, the results emphasize the importance of considering social and environmental context when evaluating microbiota-targeted interventions for laying hen behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Poultry Science
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2026.107055
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research note: Gentle versus severe feather pecking: effects of synbiotic feed supplementation under chronic stress in laying hens

Paul Forsythe, Alexandra Harlander, Gillian Hughes, Nienke van Staaveren et al.
Poultry Science
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Research note: Gentle versus severe feather pecking: effects of synbiotic feed supplementation under chronic stress in laying hens

Paul Forsythe, Alexandra Harlander, Gillian Hughes, Nienke van Staaveren, Anna Lea Nicklas, Emily M. Leishman
article en

Abstract

Feather pecking in laying hens is a complex behavior influenced by stress and the gut microbiota, with severe feather pecking (SFP) posing a major welfare concern and gentle feather pecking (GFP) representing a non-injurious, socially mediated behavior. This study investigated the effects of a commercial synbiotic supplement on SFP, GFP, and feather damage (FD) in hens exposed to chronic social and physical stressors. A total of 394 White Leghorn hens from high, low, and unselected feather pecking lines were housed in twelve floor pens. Pens received either synbiotic-supplemented or control feed, and within each feed treatment half of the pens were exposed to stressors including social mixing, perch removal, and litter reduction over a four-week period. Behavioral observations and plumage assessments were conducted before and after stress exposure. Synbiotic supplementation did not significantly affect SFP or FD scores. However, stressors alone doubled SFP rates and tripled the likelihood of severe FD. GFP was significantly influenced by an interaction between feed and stress treatments; however post hoc comparisons indicated a trend toward higher GFP in stressed synbiotic-fed hens compared with their non-stressed counterparts, with no differences observed in control birds. These findings indicate that synbiotic supplementation via feed did not mitigate stress-induced SFP or FD, while subtle differences in GFP expression highlight the sensitivity of non-injurious pecking behaviors to behavioral context under stress. Overall, the results emphasize the importance of considering social and environmental context when evaluating microbiota-targeted interventions for laying hen behavior.

Poultry ScienceVol. 105(8)
University of Alberta (CA), Canadian Animal Health Institute (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.