The effect of genetically predicted higher adulthood body mass index on blood pressure traits: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomisation studies.

<ns3:p>Background Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have been used to investigate whether higher body mass index causally influences blood pressure outcomes. However, conclusions vary across studies, potentially reflecting differences in risk of bias, populations and analytical methods. This systematic review aims to synthesise MR evidence on the effect of variation in adulthood body mass index (BMI) on blood pressure outcomes. Methods We will search three databases (Embase, MEDLINE and Science Citation Index). Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full texts for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted into predefined tables using Microsoft Excel. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence will be assessed using modified risk-of-bias tools and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE), respectively. The evidence will then be synthesised and presented in figures and tables, as appropriate. The reporting of this systematic review will follow the PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Anticipated findings By comparing methods and results and potentially meta-analysing results, we will be able to precisely estimate the magnitude and likelihood of the causal effect of adulthood BMI on blood pressure. As well as examining whether the findings are consistent across studies, we will also determine risk of bias for each exposure-outcome pair. We will establish sources of between study heterogeneity. In subsequent work, this systematic review will be triangulated with evidence from randomised controlled trials.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.26288.1
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of genetically predicted higher adulthood body mass index on blood pressure traits: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomisation studies.

D Lawlor, Farhad Shokraneh, Ge Chen, Liu Yi et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

The effect of genetically predicted higher adulthood body mass index on blood pressure traits: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomisation studies.

D Lawlor, Farhad Shokraneh, Ge Chen, Liu Yi, Julian Pt Higgins, Tom.R. Gaunt, Winfred Gatua
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have been used to investigate whether higher body mass index causally influences blood pressure outcomes. However, conclusions vary across studies, potentially reflecting differences in risk of bias, populations and analytical methods. This systematic review aims to synthesise MR evidence on the effect of variation in adulthood body mass index (BMI) on blood pressure outcomes. Methods We will search three databases (Embase, MEDLINE and Science Citation Index). Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full texts for inclusion according to eligibility criteria. Data will be extracted into predefined tables using Microsoft Excel. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence will be assessed using modified risk-of-bias tools and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach (GRADE), respectively. The evidence will then be synthesised and presented in figures and tables, as appropriate. The reporting of this systematic review will follow the PRISMA-2020 guidelines. Anticipated findings By comparing methods and results and potentially meta-analysing results, we will be able to precisely estimate the magnitude and likelihood of the causal effect of adulthood BMI on blood pressure. As well as examining whether the findings are consistent across studies, we will also determine risk of bias for each exposure-outcome pair. We will establish sources of between study heterogeneity. In subsequent work, this systematic review will be triangulated with evidence from randomised controlled trials.</ns3:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
University of Exeter (GB), University Of Bristol Dental Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Mauritius Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.