A randomised controlled trial of defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM: To determine whether defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation (MPA) reduces transthoracic impedance and improves cardioversion and survival from initially shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared with standard defibrillation. METHODS: Investigator-initiated, open-label, two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial across 216 ambulance stations in Victoria, Australia (April 1, 2022-January 31, 2023). Adults (≥18 years) with OHCA and a shockable rhythm receiving an attempted resuscitation were eligible. Intervention clusters applied MPA during shock delivery using a choreographed sequence and safety protocols; control clusters performed standard defibrillation. All shocks were biphasic at 200 joules with anterior-lateral pad position. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 560 patients, (intervention, n=279; control, n=281). Survival to hospital discharge was 39.8% (111/279) in the intervention group vs 39.9% (112/281) in the control (absolute risk difference [AR] -0.1% [95% CI -8.2%, 8.0%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.00 [95% CI 0.71, 1.40]; p=0.99). Twelve‑month survival, favourable neurologic outcome, and quality of life were similar between groups. Transthoracic impedance was significantly reduced with MPA (AR -8.5 ohms [95% CI -12.9, -4.1]; p<0.001), and larger in per‑protocol analyses (AR -15.0 ohms [95% CI -22.8, -7.2]; p<0.001). Compliance with MPA was low (23.6%). Perceptible shocks were uncommon and comparable across groups (0.75 vs 0.71 per 1,000 shocks delivered); no serious injuries occurred. The trial was prematurely terminated due to external safety reviews and operational delays, without outcome unblinding at the time of termination. CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely terminated RCT, MPA reduced transthoracic impedance but did not improve survival or other clinical outcomes in initially shockable OHCA. Trial registration ACTRN12621000804886.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resuscitation
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111121
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomised controlled trial of defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Emily Mahony, Daniel Okyere, Peter M. Kistler, Jason Bloom et al.
Resuscitation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

A randomised controlled trial of defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Emily Mahony, Daniel Okyere, Peter M. Kistler, Jason Bloom, Belinda Delardes, Dion Stub, Karen Smith, Aleksandr Voskoboinik, Emily Nehme, Tegwyn McManamny, Jocasta Ball, Ziad Nehme, David Anderson
article en

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether defibrillation with manual pressure augmentation (MPA) reduces transthoracic impedance and improves cardioversion and survival from initially shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) compared with standard defibrillation. METHODS: Investigator-initiated, open-label, two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial across 216 ambulance stations in Victoria, Australia (April 1, 2022-January 31, 2023). Adults (≥18 years) with OHCA and a shockable rhythm receiving an attempted resuscitation were eligible. Intervention clusters applied MPA during shock delivery using a choreographed sequence and safety protocols; control clusters performed standard defibrillation. All shocks were biphasic at 200 joules with anterior-lateral pad position. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT) population included 560 patients, (intervention, n=279; control, n=281). Survival to hospital discharge was 39.8% (111/279) in the intervention group vs 39.9% (112/281) in the control (absolute risk difference [AR] -0.1% [95% CI -8.2%, 8.0%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.00 [95% CI 0.71, 1.40]; p=0.99). Twelve‑month survival, favourable neurologic outcome, and quality of life were similar between groups. Transthoracic impedance was significantly reduced with MPA (AR -8.5 ohms [95% CI -12.9, -4.1]; p<0.001), and larger in per‑protocol analyses (AR -15.0 ohms [95% CI -22.8, -7.2]; p<0.001). Compliance with MPA was low (23.6%). Perceptible shocks were uncommon and comparable across groups (0.75 vs 0.71 per 1,000 shocks delivered); no serious injuries occurred. The trial was prematurely terminated due to external safety reviews and operational delays, without outcome unblinding at the time of termination. CONCLUSIONS: In this prematurely terminated RCT, MPA reduced transthoracic impedance but did not improve survival or other clinical outcomes in initially shockable OHCA. Trial registration ACTRN12621000804886.

Resuscitation
Ambulance Victoria (AU), Monash Health (AU), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
National Heart Foundation of Australia, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.