Accuracy of the ESCRS online calculator for enhanced monofocal intraocular lens power calculation

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive accuracy of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) online intraocular lens (IOL) calculator for enhanced monofocal IOLs and to compare its performance with commonly used IOL formulas, including BUII, SRK/T, and Haigis. Methods: This retrospective case-series included 95 eyes from 95 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with ICB00 IOL. IOL power was calculated using the ESCRS calculator (Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Pearl DGS), and BUII, SRK/T, and Haigis formulas using IOLMaster 700. Prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), the proportion of eyes with a PE within ± 0.50 D of target refraction, and the formula performance index (FPI) were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively with and without constant optimization. Results: Without constant optimization, the Kane formula achieved the lowest MedAE (0.22 D) and the highest proportion of eyes with PE within ± 0.50 D (85.3%). With constant optimization, the Kane and Cooke K6 formulas showed the lowest MedAE (0.18 D each), and Kane and EVO 2.0 demonstrated the highest percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D (85.3%). The proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D showed statistically significant overall differences among formulas under both conditions (P < 0.05 each), although no significant pairwise differences were observed after optimization. The highest FPI values were observed for Cooke K6, Hill-RBF 3.0, and Kane, whereas SRK/T and Haigis consistently demonstrated the lowest performance. Conclusions: The ESCRS online IOL calculator demonstrated superior MedAE and FPI compared with traditional formulas (SRK/T and Haigis), while the accuracy in achieving a postoperative refraction within ±0.50 D was comparable among eyes implanted with enhanced monofocal IOLs. These results support the clinical utility of the ESCRS calculator for accurate and efficient IOL power calculation, regardless of constant optimization status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2026.0019
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of the ESCRS online calculator for enhanced monofocal intraocular lens power calculation

Kyung Eun Han, D H Lee, Soo Chang Cho, Hyun Jin Kim et al.
Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Accuracy of the ESCRS online calculator for enhanced monofocal intraocular lens power calculation

Kyung Eun Han, D H Lee, Soo Chang Cho, Hyun Jin Kim, Min Young Kim
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the refractive accuracy of the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS) online intraocular lens (IOL) calculator for enhanced monofocal IOLs and to compare its performance with commonly used IOL formulas, including BUII, SRK/T, and Haigis. Methods: This retrospective case-series included 95 eyes from 95 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with ICB00 IOL. IOL power was calculated using the ESCRS calculator (Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Hill-RBF 3.0, Hoffer QST, Kane, and Pearl DGS), and BUII, SRK/T, and Haigis formulas using IOLMaster 700. Prediction error (PE), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), the proportion of eyes with a PE within ± 0.50 D of target refraction, and the formula performance index (FPI) were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively with and without constant optimization. Results: Without constant optimization, the Kane formula achieved the lowest MedAE (0.22 D) and the highest proportion of eyes with PE within ± 0.50 D (85.3%). With constant optimization, the Kane and Cooke K6 formulas showed the lowest MedAE (0.18 D each), and Kane and EVO 2.0 demonstrated the highest percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D (85.3%). The proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 D showed statistically significant overall differences among formulas under both conditions (P < 0.05 each), although no significant pairwise differences were observed after optimization. The highest FPI values were observed for Cooke K6, Hill-RBF 3.0, and Kane, whereas SRK/T and Haigis consistently demonstrated the lowest performance. Conclusions: The ESCRS online IOL calculator demonstrated superior MedAE and FPI compared with traditional formulas (SRK/T and Haigis), while the accuracy in achieving a postoperative refraction within ±0.50 D was comparable among eyes implanted with enhanced monofocal IOLs. These results support the clinical utility of the ESCRS calculator for accurate and efficient IOL power calculation, regardless of constant optimization status.

Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.