Benralizumab in bronchiectasis: results from the phase 3 MAHALE study

Background Bronchiectasis is a chronic, inflammatory lung disease with distinct endotypes, often defined by inflammatory cells in blood and sputum. We assessed safety and efficacy of benralizumab, an anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody, in patients with bronchiectasis and eosinophilic inflammation. Methods MAHALE ( NCT05006573 ) was a 52-week, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 study. Patients with bronchiectasis and no comorbid pulmonary conditions were randomised 1:1 to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg or placebo every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was annualised exacerbation rate. Secondary endpoints included: time to first exacerbation, change from baseline in respiratory symptoms, lung function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), respiratory health status and safety. In August 2022, the study was terminated early due to recruitment challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results One-hundred patients were randomised and 99 were dosed (benralizumab, n=54; placebo, n=45); 21 had blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells·µL −1 . Notable imbalances in baseline characteristics between treatment arms suggested patients receiving benralizumab had more severe disease. The study did not enrol enough patients to meet power requirement to detect differences in efficacy endpoints between benralizumab and placebo. At the end of the study, annualised exacerbation rates were not significantly different between treatment groups (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.14 [0.71–1.82], p=0.59). Change in respiratory symptoms and HRQoL were similar between treatment groups. Benralizumab was well tolerated. Conclusions A small sample size, with eosinophil counts predominantly <300 cells·µL −1 and imbalances at baseline, limit interpretation of data on clinical outcomes following benralizumab treatment. Adequately powered randomised trials are needed in the population of interest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ERJ Open Research
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.01529-2025
Primary Topic
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benralizumab in bronchiectasis: results from the phase 3 MAHALE study

Miguel Bergna, Christopher McCrae, Annika Åstrand, Prashanth Basavanna et al.
ERJ Open Research
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
article

Benralizumab in bronchiectasis: results from the phase 3 MAHALE study

Miguel Bergna, Christopher McCrae, Annika Åstrand, Prashanth Basavanna, Ulla Møller Weinreich, Maura Gatti, Calvin N. Ho, Svitlana Salemio, Stefano Aliberti, Stefan Ivanov, Lucy Burr, Maria Jison, James D. Chalmers, Ying Fan, Ana Román
article en

Abstract

Background Bronchiectasis is a chronic, inflammatory lung disease with distinct endotypes, often defined by inflammatory cells in blood and sputum. We assessed safety and efficacy of benralizumab, an anti-IL-5Rα monoclonal antibody, in patients with bronchiectasis and eosinophilic inflammation. Methods MAHALE ( NCT05006573 ) was a 52-week, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 study. Patients with bronchiectasis and no comorbid pulmonary conditions were randomised 1:1 to receive subcutaneous benralizumab 30 mg or placebo every 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was annualised exacerbation rate. Secondary endpoints included: time to first exacerbation, change from baseline in respiratory symptoms, lung function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), respiratory health status and safety. In August 2022, the study was terminated early due to recruitment challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results One-hundred patients were randomised and 99 were dosed (benralizumab, n=54; placebo, n=45); 21 had blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells·µL −1 . Notable imbalances in baseline characteristics between treatment arms suggested patients receiving benralizumab had more severe disease. The study did not enrol enough patients to meet power requirement to detect differences in efficacy endpoints between benralizumab and placebo. At the end of the study, annualised exacerbation rates were not significantly different between treatment groups (rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.14 [0.71–1.82], p=0.59). Change in respiratory symptoms and HRQoL were similar between treatment groups. Benralizumab was well tolerated. Conclusions A small sample size, with eosinophil counts predominantly <300 cells·µL −1 and imbalances at baseline, limit interpretation of data on clinical outcomes following benralizumab treatment. Adequately powered randomised trials are needed in the population of interest.

ERJ Open Research
AstraZeneca
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.