Research Letter: Concussion Evaluation by Injury Setting Among US Children

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in medical evaluation for concussion after sports-related head trauma (SRHT) versus non-SRHT among school-aged children in the United States. SETTING: National Health Interview Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 5-17 years living in the United States. DESIGN: Caregiver-reported responses to questions on health topics among a nationally-representative sample of US children. MAIN MEASURES: Experience of concussion-like symptoms after head trauma in the prior year, injury setting, and receipt of medical evaluation for concussion from health professional. RESULTS: The study included 11,768 children aged 5-17 years in 2023-2024. An estimated 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-2.9) reported concussion-like symptoms after head trauma in the prior year, with a higher prevalence among those aged 13-17 years (3.5%; 95% CI, 3.0-4.1). Most injuries occurred outside of sports settings (60.8%; 95% CI, 54.4-66.8). Overall, 67.7% (95% CI, 61.5-73.5) of injured children received a medical evaluation for concussion. Evaluations were more common among males than females (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.249; 95% CI, 1.043-1.495) and those aged 13-17 years than aged 5-12 years (aPR, 1.366; 95% CI, 1.104-1.689). Concussion evaluations were administered to 90.4% of children with SRHT compared with only 53.1% with non-SRHT. Adjusting for relevant characteristics, we estimated medical evaluation occurred 39.2% less often for non-SRHT (aPR, 0.608; 95% CI, 0.505-0.733). Based on the 2023-2024 population estimates, this indicates approximately 388,905 (95% CI, 292,880-484,929) missed concussion evaluations for children with non-SRHT each year. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest substantially more missed concussion evaluations among children with concussion-like symptoms after non-SRHT compared with those with SRHT. Increasing awareness about concussion care among school personnel and health professionals that work with pediatric populations, and embedding clear guidance for referral and treatment into non-sports-related settings, may serve to reduce differences in evaluation and improve long-term recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/htr.0000000000001173
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Letter: Concussion Evaluation by Injury Setting Among US Children

Jennifer D. Burus, Svetla Slavova, Celysse M. van Zyl, Todd Burus
Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Research Letter: Concussion Evaluation by Injury Setting Among US Children

Jennifer D. Burus, Svetla Slavova, Celysse M. van Zyl, Todd Burus
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in medical evaluation for concussion after sports-related head trauma (SRHT) versus non-SRHT among school-aged children in the United States. SETTING: National Health Interview Survey. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 5-17 years living in the United States. DESIGN: Caregiver-reported responses to questions on health topics among a nationally-representative sample of US children. MAIN MEASURES: Experience of concussion-like symptoms after head trauma in the prior year, injury setting, and receipt of medical evaluation for concussion from health professional. RESULTS: The study included 11,768 children aged 5-17 years in 2023-2024. An estimated 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-2.9) reported concussion-like symptoms after head trauma in the prior year, with a higher prevalence among those aged 13-17 years (3.5%; 95% CI, 3.0-4.1). Most injuries occurred outside of sports settings (60.8%; 95% CI, 54.4-66.8). Overall, 67.7% (95% CI, 61.5-73.5) of injured children received a medical evaluation for concussion. Evaluations were more common among males than females (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 1.249; 95% CI, 1.043-1.495) and those aged 13-17 years than aged 5-12 years (aPR, 1.366; 95% CI, 1.104-1.689). Concussion evaluations were administered to 90.4% of children with SRHT compared with only 53.1% with non-SRHT. Adjusting for relevant characteristics, we estimated medical evaluation occurred 39.2% less often for non-SRHT (aPR, 0.608; 95% CI, 0.505-0.733). Based on the 2023-2024 population estimates, this indicates approximately 388,905 (95% CI, 292,880-484,929) missed concussion evaluations for children with non-SRHT each year. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest substantially more missed concussion evaluations among children with concussion-like symptoms after non-SRHT compared with those with SRHT. Increasing awareness about concussion care among school personnel and health professionals that work with pediatric populations, and embedding clear guidance for referral and treatment into non-sports-related settings, may serve to reduce differences in evaluation and improve long-term recovery.

Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
University of Kentucky (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.