Healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in the UK: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: To map the existing literature on transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people's experiences of healthcare in the UK, summarising key findings and characteristics of current research. DESIGN: This scoping review was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched on 29 October 2024. Reference lists of included studies were searched to identify further relevant literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Primary research of any design reporting the healthcare experiences of TGD people in the UK from 2019 onwards was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data were extracted using a data charting form guided by the research questions and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Results were narratively synthesised to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature. RESULTS: 52 studies were included, comprising qualitative (n=38), mixed-methods (n=12) and quantitative (n=2) designs. TGD people reported varying experiences across general and transition-related healthcare settings. Positive experiences were often attributed to individual clinicians. Negative experiences were common, including transphobic discrimination, insufficient clinician knowledge and barriers to effective transition-related care. Strategies for navigating healthcare, such as information sharing within the TGD community and educating clinicians about trans health needs, reflected adaptive responses to systemic barriers. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight a need for greater recognition of diverse gender identities, more inclusive approaches in healthcare education and practice and further targeted research. This is especially urgent in light of the recent UK Supreme Court judgement regarding definitions of 'sex' under the Equality Act 2010, the emerging implications of which risk compounding existing barriers by reinforcing exclusionary practices within healthcare settings and further limiting recognition and protections for TGD people in the UK.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106519
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in the UK: a scoping review

Julia Gauly, Aiden Moore, Amy Grove, Lauren Davidson
BMJ Open
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Healthcare experiences of transgender and gender-diverse people in the UK: a scoping review

Julia Gauly, Aiden Moore, Amy Grove, Lauren Davidson
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To map the existing literature on transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people's experiences of healthcare in the UK, summarising key findings and characteristics of current research. DESIGN: This scoping review was guided by the Arksey and O'Malley framework and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched on 29 October 2024. Reference lists of included studies were searched to identify further relevant literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Primary research of any design reporting the healthcare experiences of TGD people in the UK from 2019 onwards was included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data were extracted using a data charting form guided by the research questions and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Results were narratively synthesised to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature. RESULTS: 52 studies were included, comprising qualitative (n=38), mixed-methods (n=12) and quantitative (n=2) designs. TGD people reported varying experiences across general and transition-related healthcare settings. Positive experiences were often attributed to individual clinicians. Negative experiences were common, including transphobic discrimination, insufficient clinician knowledge and barriers to effective transition-related care. Strategies for navigating healthcare, such as information sharing within the TGD community and educating clinicians about trans health needs, reflected adaptive responses to systemic barriers. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight a need for greater recognition of diverse gender identities, more inclusive approaches in healthcare education and practice and further targeted research. This is especially urgent in light of the recent UK Supreme Court judgement regarding definitions of 'sex' under the Equality Act 2010, the emerging implications of which risk compounding existing barriers by reinforcing exclusionary practices within healthcare settings and further limiting recognition and protections for TGD people in the UK.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(5)
University of Liverpool (GB), Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.