The Politics of Connections in Greenland: A Typology of Imperial and Post-colonial Infrastructure Logics

The sum of built infrastructure shapes societies, just as attempts at re-shaping social order involve restructuring infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure is therefore essential to understanding colonisation and decolonisation. Nevertheless, despite an ‘infrastructural turn’, studies in geopolitics routinely proceed without thinking through the concept of infrastructure. To understand the span of infrastructures related to both colonialism and attempts to break free from it, we suggest identifying fundamental rationales informing shifting infrastructure projects. The Arctic region offers a prime site for observing such infrastructural logics and how they interact over time, as they each stand out clearly when shaping the region’s relatively dispersed flows of goods, people, and ideas across space. An analysis drawing from 300 years of infrastructural projects in Greenland, asking from where it is envisioned that which sites should be connected to facilitate what flows and for whom, allows us to identify a typology of eight distinct imperial and post-colonial logics of infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geopolitics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2026.2648553
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of Connections in Greenland: A Typology of Imperial and Post-colonial Infrastructure Logics

Ulrik Pram Gad, Mette Simonsen Abildgaard
Geopolitics
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

The Politics of Connections in Greenland: A Typology of Imperial and Post-colonial Infrastructure Logics

Ulrik Pram Gad, Mette Simonsen Abildgaard
article en

Abstract

The sum of built infrastructure shapes societies, just as attempts at re-shaping social order involve restructuring infrastructure. Understanding infrastructure is therefore essential to understanding colonisation and decolonisation. Nevertheless, despite an ‘infrastructural turn’, studies in geopolitics routinely proceed without thinking through the concept of infrastructure. To understand the span of infrastructures related to both colonialism and attempts to break free from it, we suggest identifying fundamental rationales informing shifting infrastructure projects. The Arctic region offers a prime site for observing such infrastructural logics and how they interact over time, as they each stand out clearly when shaping the region’s relatively dispersed flows of goods, people, and ideas across space. An analysis drawing from 300 years of infrastructural projects in Greenland, asking from where it is envisioned that which sites should be connected to facilitate what flows and for whom, allows us to identify a typology of eight distinct imperial and post-colonial logics of infrastructure.

Geopolitics
Danish Institute for International Studies (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.