Crisis, Angels, and Political Theology: Incapacitated Transcendence in Klee and Benjamin Against Schmitt

This study explores “incapacitated transcendence”—a divine presence that remains ontologically present but lacks sovereign power to intervene—within Paul Klee’s angel paintings. It reinterprets these figures as a critical counterpoint to Carl Schmitt’s theory of sovereignty. While Schmitt rationalized the “decision” of an omnipotent sovereign as a secularized miracle, Klee’s malformed or flightless angels present a starkly different theological device. Influenced by Nietzsche, Klee rejected traditional afterlife-oriented transcendence while preserving it as a domain inassimilable to human finitude. Following World War I, this evolved into “incapacity”—not an absence of the divine, but the structural impossibility of its manifestation through fragile human existence. By contrasting Klee’s Angelus Novus with Schmitt’s sovereign, this study argues that incapacitated transcendence deconstructs the myth of absolute political power. Drawing on Walter Benjamin’s “Angel of History,” this study concludes that this very incompetence constitutes a site of hope. This reinterpretation suggests that aesthetics can offer a profound critique of political theology, challenging absolutist models of power in contemporary crisis.