Clinical and Inflammatory Determinants of Heart Failure Severity Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Post-Infarction Care

Background: Post-infarction heart failure (HF) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality despite advances in reperfusion and pharmacological management. However, the combined influence of clinical background, myocardial injury, neuro-hormonal activation, and angiographic disease on HF severity is not fully defined. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 181 patients with confirmed myocardial infarction treated in a tertiary cardiology center. Demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, prior chronic HF, inflammatory markers (CRP, fibrinogen, ESR, leukocyte indices), and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) were measured at admission (pre-intervention), immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and at 48 h, angiographic lesion distributions were collected. HF severity was graded on a five-level scale and further dichotomized as no/mild HF (grade 0–1) versus moderate–severe HF (grade ≥ 2). Group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent determinants of severe HF. Results: Moderate–severe HF occurred in 42.5% of patients (77/181). Compared to HF 0–1, the HF ≥ 2 group was older (64.0 vs. 60.5 years, p = 0.042) and exhibited substantially higher systemic inflammation (CRP 41.5 vs. 9.75 mg/L, p < 0.001; fibrinogen 435 vs. 346 mg/dL, p = 0.0002; ESR 28 vs. 18 mm/h, p = 0.0004). hs-Tn levels and NT-proBNP were significantly elevated in HF ≥ 2 (NT-proBNP 3449 vs. 1243 pg/mL, p = 0.0003), while left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced. Prior HF increased the likelihood of HF ≥ 2 (54.5% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.0078), and conservative therapy was associated with adverse outcomes (87.5% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.0235). In multivariable analysis, NT-proBNP remained the only independent predictor of moderate–severe HF, while CRP showed a positive but non-significant trend after adjustment. Conclusions: Post-MI HF severity reflects the combined influence of myocardial injury, neurohormonal stress, and systemic inflammatory activation. However, in multivariable analysis, NT-proBNP emerged as the dominant independent predictor of moderate–severe HF, while CRP reflected an associated but non-independent inflammatory signal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd13050197
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical and Inflammatory Determinants of Heart Failure Severity Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Post-Infarction Care

Mircea Ioachim Popescu, I. Ardelean, Mădălina Ioana Moisi, Timea Claudia Ghitea et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article

Clinical and Inflammatory Determinants of Heart Failure Severity Following Myocardial Infarction: Implications for Post-Infarction Care

Mircea Ioachim Popescu, I. Ardelean, Mădălina Ioana Moisi, Timea Claudia Ghitea, Marius Rus, Corina Cinezan, Evelin Claudia Ghiţea, Alexandra Manuela Buzle, Marc Cristian Ghitea, Priscilla Matache, Roxana Daniela Brata
article en

Abstract

Background: Post-infarction heart failure (HF) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality despite advances in reperfusion and pharmacological management. However, the combined influence of clinical background, myocardial injury, neuro-hormonal activation, and angiographic disease on HF severity is not fully defined. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 181 patients with confirmed myocardial infarction treated in a tertiary cardiology center. Demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, prior chronic HF, inflammatory markers (CRP, fibrinogen, ESR, leukocyte indices), and high-sensitivity troponin (hs-Tn) were measured at admission (pre-intervention), immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and at 48 h, angiographic lesion distributions were collected. HF severity was graded on a five-level scale and further dichotomized as no/mild HF (grade 0–1) versus moderate–severe HF (grade ≥ 2). Group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify independent determinants of severe HF. Results: Moderate–severe HF occurred in 42.5% of patients (77/181). Compared to HF 0–1, the HF ≥ 2 group was older (64.0 vs. 60.5 years, p = 0.042) and exhibited substantially higher systemic inflammation (CRP 41.5 vs. 9.75 mg/L, p < 0.001; fibrinogen 435 vs. 346 mg/dL, p = 0.0002; ESR 28 vs. 18 mm/h, p = 0.0004). hs-Tn levels and NT-proBNP were significantly elevated in HF ≥ 2 (NT-proBNP 3449 vs. 1243 pg/mL, p = 0.0003), while left ventricular ejection fraction was reduced. Prior HF increased the likelihood of HF ≥ 2 (54.5% vs. 33.7%, p = 0.0078), and conservative therapy was associated with adverse outcomes (87.5% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.0235). In multivariable analysis, NT-proBNP remained the only independent predictor of moderate–severe HF, while CRP showed a positive but non-significant trend after adjustment. Conclusions: Post-MI HF severity reflects the combined influence of myocardial injury, neurohormonal stress, and systemic inflammatory activation. However, in multivariable analysis, NT-proBNP emerged as the dominant independent predictor of moderate–severe HF, while CRP reflected an associated but non-independent inflammatory signal.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and DiseaseVol. 13(5)
University of Oradea (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.