Deep learning reconstruction improves detection of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase compared to conventional EOB-MRI

Objective In recent years, the application of Deep Learning Reconstruction (DL Recon) technology in MRI has significantly improved the detection rate of small focal liver lesions (FLLs). This study aims to compare the detection performance of DL Recon EOB-MRI with traditional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) for FLL detection. Methods This prospective, single-center study included 53 patients who underwent EOB-MRI during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). For each patient, four types of images were acquired: 3 mm thickness non-DL reconstruction (Standard Non-DL), 3 mm thickness DL reconstruction (Standard DL), 1 mm thickness non-DL reconstruction (HR Non-DL), and 1 mm thickness DL reconstruction (HR-DL). Lesions were categorized based on signal intensity into high-signal and low-signal types, and classified into five size groups: >30 mm, 20–30 mm, 10–20mm, 5–10mm, and <5 mm. Three abdominal radiologists independently assessed the number of FLLs on HBP images. Pairwise comparisons between the four types of images were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Generalized Estimating Equations to assess differences. Results The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between all groups was >0.90, indicating excellent consistency ( P < 0.001). For high-signal lesions, no differences were observed across groups (except for the total number of high-signal lesions: Standard DL vs. Standard Non-DL: P†† = 0.048, all other P > 0.05). For large low-signal lesions (>10 mm), no significant differences were found between groups ( P > 0.05). For small low-signal lesions (5–10 mm), the Standard DL group showed significantly more lesions than the Standard Non-DL group ( P †† = 0.030). For small low-signal lesions (<5 mm), both DL and Non-DL HR techniques detected significantly more lesions than Non-DL alone ( P † ≤ 0.032). Conclusion DL-Recon combined with MR techniques demonstrates significant clinical value in enhancing the detection of small low-signal lesions in EOB-MRI hepatobiliary phase, significantly improving the detection rate of FLLs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1797117
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep learning reconstruction improves detection of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase compared to conventional EOB-MRI

Qichao Cheng, 徐田勇, Weiwei Lv, Cheng Li et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Deep learning reconstruction improves detection of focal liver lesions in hepatobiliary phase compared to conventional EOB-MRI

Qichao Cheng, 徐田勇, Weiwei Lv, Cheng Li, Xuewen Peng, Ruixin Tao, Linlin Lang, Runzhe Tian, Dexin Yu, Dmytro Pylypenko, Liping Zuo
article en

Abstract

Objective In recent years, the application of Deep Learning Reconstruction (DL Recon) technology in MRI has significantly improved the detection rate of small focal liver lesions (FLLs). This study aims to compare the detection performance of DL Recon EOB-MRI with traditional Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) for FLL detection. Methods This prospective, single-center study included 53 patients who underwent EOB-MRI during the hepatobiliary phase (HBP). For each patient, four types of images were acquired: 3 mm thickness non-DL reconstruction (Standard Non-DL), 3 mm thickness DL reconstruction (Standard DL), 1 mm thickness non-DL reconstruction (HR Non-DL), and 1 mm thickness DL reconstruction (HR-DL). Lesions were categorized based on signal intensity into high-signal and low-signal types, and classified into five size groups: >30 mm, 20–30 mm, 10–20mm, 5–10mm, and <5 mm. Three abdominal radiologists independently assessed the number of FLLs on HBP images. Pairwise comparisons between the four types of images were made using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Generalized Estimating Equations to assess differences. Results The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between all groups was >0.90, indicating excellent consistency ( P < 0.001). For high-signal lesions, no differences were observed across groups (except for the total number of high-signal lesions: Standard DL vs. Standard Non-DL: P†† = 0.048, all other P > 0.05). For large low-signal lesions (>10 mm), no significant differences were found between groups ( P > 0.05). For small low-signal lesions (5–10 mm), the Standard DL group showed significantly more lesions than the Standard Non-DL group ( P †† = 0.030). For small low-signal lesions (<5 mm), both DL and Non-DL HR techniques detected significantly more lesions than Non-DL alone ( P † ≤ 0.032). Conclusion DL-Recon combined with MR techniques demonstrates significant clinical value in enhancing the detection of small low-signal lesions in EOB-MRI hepatobiliary phase, significantly improving the detection rate of FLLs.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Qilu University of Technology (CN), General Electric (Spain) (ES), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.