Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management

Background: Pediatric septic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality and requires timely recognition and management across multiple hospital settings. Although intensive care support is critical, outcomes are also influenced by earlier phases of care, including emergency department recognition, first-hour treatment, inpatient monitoring, and timely escalation to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Objective: We aimed to review pediatric septic shock across the full hospital trajectory, from emergency department recognition to PICU management and outcomes, with emphasis on diagnostic challenges, early treatment, escalation of care, and prognostic assessment. Methods: This narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, with emphasis on international guidelines, consensus statements, systematic reviews, and clinically relevant pediatric studies addressing recognition, resuscitation, escalation, intensive care management, and outcomes in pediatric septic shock. Results: Pediatric septic shock is best approached as a dynamic continuum rather than a single event. Early recognition is complicated by age-dependent physiology, nonspecific presentation, and delayed hypotension. Timely antimicrobial therapy, individualized fluid resuscitation, early vasoactive support, and repeated reassessment during the first hours are central to management. Ward surveillance and prompt escalation to PICU are critical, as delayed recognition of deterioration may worsen organ dysfunction and resource use. In the PICU, phenotype-informed hemodynamic support, fluid stewardship, respiratory support, and organ support are essential. Outcomes should be evaluated beyond mortality to include organ dysfunction burden, duration of support, length of stay, and longer-term functional recovery. Conclusions: Pediatric septic shock outcomes are shaped by the entire hospital care pathway rather than PICU treatment alone. A trajectory-based, continuum-of-care approach may improve timely diagnosis, escalation, and short- and longer-term outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13050622
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management

Efrossini Briassouli, George Briassoulis
Children
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Care Pathway and Outcomes in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Narrative Review from Emergency Department Recognition to PICU Management

Efrossini Briassouli, George Briassoulis
article en

Abstract

Background: Pediatric septic shock remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality and requires timely recognition and management across multiple hospital settings. Although intensive care support is critical, outcomes are also influenced by earlier phases of care, including emergency department recognition, first-hour treatment, inpatient monitoring, and timely escalation to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Objective: We aimed to review pediatric septic shock across the full hospital trajectory, from emergency department recognition to PICU management and outcomes, with emphasis on diagnostic challenges, early treatment, escalation of care, and prognostic assessment. Methods: This narrative review was based on a structured literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, with emphasis on international guidelines, consensus statements, systematic reviews, and clinically relevant pediatric studies addressing recognition, resuscitation, escalation, intensive care management, and outcomes in pediatric septic shock. Results: Pediatric septic shock is best approached as a dynamic continuum rather than a single event. Early recognition is complicated by age-dependent physiology, nonspecific presentation, and delayed hypotension. Timely antimicrobial therapy, individualized fluid resuscitation, early vasoactive support, and repeated reassessment during the first hours are central to management. Ward surveillance and prompt escalation to PICU are critical, as delayed recognition of deterioration may worsen organ dysfunction and resource use. In the PICU, phenotype-informed hemodynamic support, fluid stewardship, respiratory support, and organ support are essential. Outcomes should be evaluated beyond mortality to include organ dysfunction burden, duration of support, length of stay, and longer-term functional recovery. Conclusions: Pediatric septic shock outcomes are shaped by the entire hospital care pathway rather than PICU treatment alone. A trajectory-based, continuum-of-care approach may improve timely diagnosis, escalation, and short- and longer-term outcomes.

ChildrenVol. 13(5)
University of Crete (GR), Panagiotis & Aglaia Kyriakou Children's Hospital (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.