PHANTOM: polymorphic honeytoken adaptation with narrative-tailored organisational mimicry contextually convincing cyber deception at scale

Honeytokens, decoy digital assets planted to detect and attribute unauthorised access, are a well-established primitive in cyber deception. Existing generation tools produce static, template-based tokens that lack organisational specificity and are identifiable by statistical, syntactic, and semantic analysis. We introduce PHANTOM (polymorphic honeytoken adaptation with narrative-tailored organisational mimicry), a framework that generates contextually convincing honeytokens by encoding organisation-specific knowledge—domain names, service naming conventions, technology-stack idioms, and realistic secret-value distributions—into a multi-component generation pipeline. We formalise honeytoken quality through a four-component Believability Score that captures syntactic validity, semantic coherence, statistical plausibility, and human acceptance. We use this metric to evaluate PHANTOM across 8 token types and 4 organisational contexts against a template-based baseline. PHANTOM achieves $$B = 0.778 \pm 0.057$$ versus $$B = 0.576 \pm 0.058$$ for templates ( $$\Delta = +0.203$$ , $$t = 14.07$$ , $$p < 0.001$$ , Cohen’s $$d = 3.52$$ ). A heuristic human-acceptance proxy rises from $$6.2\%$$ to $$100\%$$ under a rule-based scoring threshold rather than an actual human-subjects study, and detection resistance (DR $$= 1 - P_d$$ ) improves from 0.609 to 0.870 across three simulated scanner models (regex, entropy analysis, and ML classifier), each with $$p < 0.001$$ . The semantic coherence gap ( $$\Delta S_c = +0.309$$ , $$d = 4.52$$ ) is the dominant driver, confirming the hypothesis that organisational context is the critical missing ingredient in current approaches. All results are reproduced without external API calls, making the pipeline fully deployable in air-gapped environments. The current evaluation is based on $$n=32$$ tokens per method (8 types $$\times $$ 4 organisational profiles, one instance per type—organisation pair); future work will extend this to larger, independently-replicated cohorts, real human-subject studies, and adversarial LLM-based scanners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Information Security
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-026-01323-0
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PHANTOM: polymorphic honeytoken adaptation with narrative-tailored organisational mimicry contextually convincing cyber deception at scale

Abraham Itzhak Weinberg
International Journal of Information Security
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

PHANTOM: polymorphic honeytoken adaptation with narrative-tailored organisational mimicry contextually convincing cyber deception at scale

Abraham Itzhak Weinberg
article en

Abstract

Honeytokens, decoy digital assets planted to detect and attribute unauthorised access, are a well-established primitive in cyber deception. Existing generation tools produce static, template-based tokens that lack organisational specificity and are identifiable by statistical, syntactic, and semantic analysis. We introduce PHANTOM (polymorphic honeytoken adaptation with narrative-tailored organisational mimicry), a framework that generates contextually convincing honeytokens by encoding organisation-specific knowledge—domain names, service naming conventions, technology-stack idioms, and realistic secret-value distributions—into a multi-component generation pipeline. We formalise honeytoken quality through a four-component Believability Score that captures syntactic validity, semantic coherence, statistical plausibility, and human acceptance. We use this metric to evaluate PHANTOM across 8 token types and 4 organisational contexts against a template-based baseline. PHANTOM achieves $$B = 0.778 \pm 0.057$$ versus $$B = 0.576 \pm 0.058$$ for templates ( $$\Delta = +0.203$$ , $$t = 14.07$$ , $$p < 0.001$$ , Cohen’s $$d = 3.52$$ ). A heuristic human-acceptance proxy rises from $$6.2\%$$ to $$100\%$$ under a rule-based scoring threshold rather than an actual human-subjects study, and detection resistance (DR $$= 1 - P_d$$ ) improves from 0.609 to 0.870 across three simulated scanner models (regex, entropy analysis, and ML classifier), each with $$p < 0.001$$ . The semantic coherence gap ( $$\Delta S_c = +0.309$$ , $$d = 4.52$$ ) is the dominant driver, confirming the hypothesis that organisational context is the critical missing ingredient in current approaches. All results are reproduced without external API calls, making the pipeline fully deployable in air-gapped environments. The current evaluation is based on $$n=32$$ tokens per method (8 types $$\times $$ 4 organisational profiles, one instance per type—organisation pair); future work will extend this to larger, independently-replicated cohorts, real human-subject studies, and adversarial LLM-based scanners.

International Journal of Information SecurityVol. 25(5)
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.