China and New Geopolitics of the Electricity Age: The Reconfiguration of Global Power

This article examines how the global transition from a fossil-fuel-based energy system to an electricity-centered energy order is reshaping the geopolitical structure of power. It argues that the rise of an electricity-based civilization is not merely an energy transition, but a profound transformation in the material foundations, strategic logic, and institutional forms of global politics. In contrast to the oil age in which geopolitical competition primarily revolved around the control of fuel reserves and transport routes, the electricity age is increasingly defined by competition over critical minerals, high-end power equipment, nuclear energy technology, and grid standards. Focusing on copper and lithium as strategic resources, transformers and nuclear power as key industrial capabilities, and ultra-high-voltage transmission and technical standards as instruments of structural influence, the article analyzes the emerging geography of power in the electricity era. It further compares the strategic choices of China, the United States, and the European Union, showing that China seeks to consolidate full-chain industrial advantages and enhance its rule-shaping capacity, the United States prioritizes hegemonic maintenance through supply-chain restructuring and alliance-based exclusion, and the European Union pursues a balancing strategy centered on energy sovereignty, regulatory influence, and multilateral coordination. The article contends that the geopolitics of electricity is shaped by three principal fault lines—resources, technology, and rules—while also generating new incentives for cooperation under conditions of climate vulnerability and infrastructural interdependence. It concludes that the future global electricity order is likely to evolve toward a pattern of multipolar leadership, regional integration, and pluralistic co-governance, in which technological capability, resource control, and standard-setting authority jointly determine the reconfiguration of global power.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2377740026500028
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

China and New Geopolitics of the Electricity Age: The Reconfiguration of Global Power

Yu Hongyuan
China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

China and New Geopolitics of the Electricity Age: The Reconfiguration of Global Power

Yu Hongyuan
article en

Abstract

This article examines how the global transition from a fossil-fuel-based energy system to an electricity-centered energy order is reshaping the geopolitical structure of power. It argues that the rise of an electricity-based civilization is not merely an energy transition, but a profound transformation in the material foundations, strategic logic, and institutional forms of global politics. In contrast to the oil age in which geopolitical competition primarily revolved around the control of fuel reserves and transport routes, the electricity age is increasingly defined by competition over critical minerals, high-end power equipment, nuclear energy technology, and grid standards. Focusing on copper and lithium as strategic resources, transformers and nuclear power as key industrial capabilities, and ultra-high-voltage transmission and technical standards as instruments of structural influence, the article analyzes the emerging geography of power in the electricity era. It further compares the strategic choices of China, the United States, and the European Union, showing that China seeks to consolidate full-chain industrial advantages and enhance its rule-shaping capacity, the United States prioritizes hegemonic maintenance through supply-chain restructuring and alliance-based exclusion, and the European Union pursues a balancing strategy centered on energy sovereignty, regulatory influence, and multilateral coordination. The article contends that the geopolitics of electricity is shaped by three principal fault lines—resources, technology, and rules—while also generating new incentives for cooperation under conditions of climate vulnerability and infrastructural interdependence. It concludes that the future global electricity order is likely to evolve toward a pattern of multipolar leadership, regional integration, and pluralistic co-governance, in which technological capability, resource control, and standard-setting authority jointly determine the reconfiguration of global power.

China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

China and New Geopolitics of the Electricity Age: The Reconfiguration of Global Power — Yu Hongyuan · China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS