Aerodynamic noise sources and acoustic field characteristics of high-speed trains: Impact of ground modeling

To investigate the impact of different ground modeling approaches on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed trains, this study adopts a numerical simulation method based on Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equations. Aerodynamic noise sources and sound field characteristics of a simplified three-car high-speed train are compared between flat-ground modeling and refined bridge modeling. The results show that bridge modeling narrows the flow space beneath the train, leading to fragmentation and lateral overflow of vortex structures, thereby modifying the noise spectrum distribution. Under flat-ground modeling, sound energy is concentrated in the mid-frequency range (250–1600 Hz) with higher source intensity, while bridge modeling disperses sound energy toward both low and high frequencies, resulting in an overall reduction in noise level. The study further reveals that the underbody region serves as the main noise contributor. Although bridge modeling reduces overall noise by decreasing the underbody-to-rail gap, the fragmented vortex structures simultaneously enhance low- and high-frequency noise components. In terms of far-field noise, bridge modeling yields lower sound pressure levels; however, the difference between bridge and flat-ground modeling gradually widens downstream, reaching a maximum of ∼4 dB. This variation is attributed to the combined effects of mid-frequency sound energy peaks and high-frequency sound energy contributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0326317
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aerodynamic noise sources and acoustic field characteristics of high-speed trains: Impact of ground modeling

Zhenxu Sun, J Huang, Guowei Yang, Weishuang Lu et al.
Physics of Fluids
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

Aerodynamic noise sources and acoustic field characteristics of high-speed trains: Impact of ground modeling

Zhenxu Sun, J Huang, Guowei Yang, Weishuang Lu, Dilong Guo
article en

Abstract

To investigate the impact of different ground modeling approaches on the aerodynamic noise characteristics of high-speed trains, this study adopts a numerical simulation method based on Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equations. Aerodynamic noise sources and sound field characteristics of a simplified three-car high-speed train are compared between flat-ground modeling and refined bridge modeling. The results show that bridge modeling narrows the flow space beneath the train, leading to fragmentation and lateral overflow of vortex structures, thereby modifying the noise spectrum distribution. Under flat-ground modeling, sound energy is concentrated in the mid-frequency range (250–1600 Hz) with higher source intensity, while bridge modeling disperses sound energy toward both low and high frequencies, resulting in an overall reduction in noise level. The study further reveals that the underbody region serves as the main noise contributor. Although bridge modeling reduces overall noise by decreasing the underbody-to-rail gap, the fragmented vortex structures simultaneously enhance low- and high-frequency noise components. In terms of far-field noise, bridge modeling yields lower sound pressure levels; however, the difference between bridge and flat-ground modeling gradually widens downstream, reaching a maximum of ∼4 dB. This variation is attributed to the combined effects of mid-frequency sound energy peaks and high-frequency sound energy contributions.

Physics of FluidsVol. 38(5)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wuyi University (CN), Wuyi University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.