Machine learning predicts postoperative mortality in a Latin American cardiovascular surgery multicenter cohort: Toward precision risk stratification

OBJECTIVE: A total of 28% of global cardiac surgeries are performed in Latin America; however, surgeons there are faced with many preventable deaths, partly as the result of the lack of accurate, region-specific risk assessment tools. We developed an explainable machine learning (ML) model tailored to a multicenter Latin American cohort that outperformed European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores in predicting postoperative mortality. METHODS: We analyzed 8680 adult cardiovascular surgery cases (2010-2025) from 5 Latin American countries. Sixty perioperative variables trained 5 ML models-random forest, neural network, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and logistic regression-in R. The models were trained with repeated 10-fold cross-validation (80%) and tested (20%). Performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, calibration) was compared with traditional scores. Shapley Additive exPlanations values explained predictions at both the cohort and individual levels. RESULTS: The eXtreme Gradient Boosting model showed the greatest accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.80; sensitivity, 75.4%, specificity, 73.6%). Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified creatinine clearance (0.142) and mean arterial pressure (0.134) as top predictors. Risk factors included chronic kidney disease (+0.25) and malnutrition (+0.22); protective features were mean arterial pressure >80 mm Hg (-0.25) and high-volume centers (-0.20). Low-volume centers (<500 surgeries/year) had greater mortality (6.2% vs 4.2%, P < .001). Synergistic risk factors amplified effects, whereas protective factors mitigated them. High-risk patients were elderly (72.6 ± 10.4 years), with renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 48.3 mL/min) or emergency cases (23% mortality). Predicted high-risk profiles correlated strongly with observed outcomes (83%, P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first explainable ML tool for Latin American cardiovascular surgery, which outperforms existing models and reveals actionable risk factors to guide preoperative care and policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2026.02.036
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning predicts postoperative mortality in a Latin American cardiovascular surgery multicenter cohort: Toward precision risk stratification

Santiago Cubas, Gerardo Soca, Víctor Dayan, Joaquín Gundelach et al.
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Machine learning predicts postoperative mortality in a Latin American cardiovascular surgery multicenter cohort: Toward precision risk stratification

Santiago Cubas, Gerardo Soca, Víctor Dayan, Joaquín Gundelach, Lorena Montes, Carolina Sosa Vota, W.Samir Cubas, Michael W.A. Chu, Maximiliano Hernández, Juan Montero
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A total of 28% of global cardiac surgeries are performed in Latin America; however, surgeons there are faced with many preventable deaths, partly as the result of the lack of accurate, region-specific risk assessment tools. We developed an explainable machine learning (ML) model tailored to a multicenter Latin American cohort that outperformed European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II and Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores in predicting postoperative mortality. METHODS: We analyzed 8680 adult cardiovascular surgery cases (2010-2025) from 5 Latin American countries. Sixty perioperative variables trained 5 ML models-random forest, neural network, support vector machine, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and logistic regression-in R. The models were trained with repeated 10-fold cross-validation (80%) and tested (20%). Performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, calibration) was compared with traditional scores. Shapley Additive exPlanations values explained predictions at both the cohort and individual levels. RESULTS: The eXtreme Gradient Boosting model showed the greatest accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.80; sensitivity, 75.4%, specificity, 73.6%). Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified creatinine clearance (0.142) and mean arterial pressure (0.134) as top predictors. Risk factors included chronic kidney disease (+0.25) and malnutrition (+0.22); protective features were mean arterial pressure >80 mm Hg (-0.25) and high-volume centers (-0.20). Low-volume centers (<500 surgeries/year) had greater mortality (6.2% vs 4.2%, P < .001). Synergistic risk factors amplified effects, whereas protective factors mitigated them. High-risk patients were elderly (72.6 ± 10.4 years), with renal impairment (creatinine clearance, 48.3 mL/min) or emergency cases (23% mortality). Predicted high-risk profiles correlated strongly with observed outcomes (83%, P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first explainable ML tool for Latin American cardiovascular surgery, which outperforms existing models and reveals actionable risk factors to guide preoperative care and policy.

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Western University (CA), London Health Sciences Centre (CA), Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia (CO), National Administration of Power Plants and Electrical Transmissions (Uruguay) (UY), Hospital Las Higueras (CL)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.