Agronomic biofortification in tomato: balancing micronutrient enrichment, yield, and fruit quality

Introduction Micronutrient fertilisation is a promising strategy for agronomic biofortification of tomatoes. Yet, its effects on yield formation and fruit quality remain insufficiently clarified, particularly when multiple nutrients and application methods are considered simultaneously. Methods This study evaluated a range of fertilisation treatments differing in application method (soil, foliar, and combined) and dose, assessing their effects on fruit mineral composition (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu), yield components, and quality traits, including physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacity, and an integrated quality score (IQS). Results Fertilisation significantly affected fruit mineral composition, with the strongest enrichment observed for Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu. The highest micronutrient concentrations were recorded at the highest soil application rate (5%), but this treatment caused a substantial yield reduction. In contrast, moderate treatments, particularly 1% soil and 0.1% foliar + 0.5% soil application, achieved significant mineral enrichment while maintaining stable productivity. Yield variation was primarily driven by changes in fruit number rather than fruit weight. Fruit quality traits responded strongly to fertilisation, with higher doses enhancing antioxidant capacity and moderate treatments improving taste balance. The highest IQS was obtained under a combined moderate treatment (0.5% foliar + 1% soil). Principal component analysis revealed a partial trade-off between mineral enrichment and yield, while identifying treatments with balanced performance across mineral composition, productivity, and quality. Conclusions The results demonstrate that effective agronomic biofortification of tomato fruits can be achieved through moderate, well-optimised fertilisation strategies. Such approaches enhance micronutrient content without compromising yield or overall fruit quality, providing a practical framework for sustainable improvement of the nutritional value of horticultural crops.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2026.1835095
Primary Topic
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agronomic biofortification in tomato: balancing micronutrient enrichment, yield, and fruit quality

Viktoria Atanasova, İvanka Trıngovska, Veneta Stoeva, Stanislava Grozeva et al.
Frontiers in Plant Science
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
article

Agronomic biofortification in tomato: balancing micronutrient enrichment, yield, and fruit quality

Viktoria Atanasova, İvanka Trıngovska, Veneta Stoeva, Stanislava Grozeva, Гергана Маровска
article en

Abstract

Introduction Micronutrient fertilisation is a promising strategy for agronomic biofortification of tomatoes. Yet, its effects on yield formation and fruit quality remain insufficiently clarified, particularly when multiple nutrients and application methods are considered simultaneously. Methods This study evaluated a range of fertilisation treatments differing in application method (soil, foliar, and combined) and dose, assessing their effects on fruit mineral composition (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu), yield components, and quality traits, including physicochemical properties, antioxidant capacity, and an integrated quality score (IQS). Results Fertilisation significantly affected fruit mineral composition, with the strongest enrichment observed for Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu. The highest micronutrient concentrations were recorded at the highest soil application rate (5%), but this treatment caused a substantial yield reduction. In contrast, moderate treatments, particularly 1% soil and 0.1% foliar + 0.5% soil application, achieved significant mineral enrichment while maintaining stable productivity. Yield variation was primarily driven by changes in fruit number rather than fruit weight. Fruit quality traits responded strongly to fertilisation, with higher doses enhancing antioxidant capacity and moderate treatments improving taste balance. The highest IQS was obtained under a combined moderate treatment (0.5% foliar + 1% soil). Principal component analysis revealed a partial trade-off between mineral enrichment and yield, while identifying treatments with balanced performance across mineral composition, productivity, and quality. Conclusions The results demonstrate that effective agronomic biofortification of tomato fruits can be achieved through moderate, well-optimised fertilisation strategies. Such approaches enhance micronutrient content without compromising yield or overall fruit quality, providing a practical framework for sustainable improvement of the nutritional value of horticultural crops.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 17
Maritsa Vegetable Crops Research Institute (BG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.