Defining orthoplastic limb salvage centers: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Limb salvage centers have increased in number over time, but lack standardized defining criteria. This systematic review aimed to assess organizational features of limb salvage centers and determine whether orthoplastic centers, in comparison to vascular limb salvage centers, represent a distinct care model that may benefit from standardization. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of publications related to limb salvage centers by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from their inception through 2024. We quantified binary data extraction as a reporting score of 26 organizational features across six structural care domains for limb salvage centers, based on a validated quality measurement framework. Organizational features differentiating distinct center types were identified to establish a quality framework for orthoplastic centers. Statistical comparisons between center types were performed using appropriate tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Of 118 included studies, orthoplastic (n = 43) and vascular (n = 48) centers represented 77% of all studies. Recent increases in orthoplastic publications show substantial variability in organizational features. Orthoplastic center literature more frequently reported plastic surgery consultation criteria (p < 0.001), surgical outcomes (p < 0.001), and centralized network integration (p ≤ 0.006), highlighting acute reconstructive approaches. Vascular center studies documented significantly more organizational team features (p < 0.001) and quality systems (p = 0.033), reflecting established care frameworks for chronic disease management. Six organizational features characterized orthoplastic centers with > 70% prevalence, providing a benchmark framework with standardization priorities. CONCLUSION: Orthoplastic limb salvage centers demonstrate distinct care paradigms that benefit from standardization. Our findings suggest structural benchmarks to support the need for standardized development of orthoplastic limb salvage centers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06325-0
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining orthoplastic limb salvage centers: a systematic review

Ian L. Valerio, Kyle R. Eberlin, Krystle R. Tuaño, Fernando Jaime Ticona Pacheco et al.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Defining orthoplastic limb salvage centers: a systematic review

Ian L. Valerio, Kyle R. Eberlin, Krystle R. Tuaño, Fernando Jaime Ticona Pacheco, Floris V. Raasveld, Kamilcan Oflazoglu, Hinne Rakhorst, Marco J P F Ritt, Omar Moussa, Marcos R Gonzalez
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Limb salvage centers have increased in number over time, but lack standardized defining criteria. This systematic review aimed to assess organizational features of limb salvage centers and determine whether orthoplastic centers, in comparison to vascular limb salvage centers, represent a distinct care model that may benefit from standardization. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of publications related to limb salvage centers by searching MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from their inception through 2024. We quantified binary data extraction as a reporting score of 26 organizational features across six structural care domains for limb salvage centers, based on a validated quality measurement framework. Organizational features differentiating distinct center types were identified to establish a quality framework for orthoplastic centers. Statistical comparisons between center types were performed using appropriate tests (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Of 118 included studies, orthoplastic (n = 43) and vascular (n = 48) centers represented 77% of all studies. Recent increases in orthoplastic publications show substantial variability in organizational features. Orthoplastic center literature more frequently reported plastic surgery consultation criteria (p < 0.001), surgical outcomes (p < 0.001), and centralized network integration (p ≤ 0.006), highlighting acute reconstructive approaches. Vascular center studies documented significantly more organizational team features (p < 0.001) and quality systems (p = 0.033), reflecting established care frameworks for chronic disease management. Six organizational features characterized orthoplastic centers with > 70% prevalence, providing a benchmark framework with standardization priorities. CONCLUSION: Orthoplastic limb salvage centers demonstrate distinct care paradigms that benefit from standardization. Our findings suggest structural benchmarks to support the need for standardized development of orthoplastic limb salvage centers.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
University Medical Center Groningen (NL), Harvard University (US), University of Groningen (NL), Hanze University of Applied Sciences (NL), Erasmus MC (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Netherland-America Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.