AI facial expression valence: reproducibility in healthy Japanese adults for digital environments

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based facial expression analysis can estimate emotional valence rapidly and noninvasively without the need for human training. However, reproducibility data remain limited, particularly in East Asian populations, where facial expressions may be more subtle. Establishing reproducibility in this context is essential for evaluating whether AI-derived valence measures may be useful in digital environments and mental health-related monitoring. Therefore, this study had two aims: (1) to evaluate state-specific reproducibility for positive, negative, and neutral facial expressions, and (2) to examine short-term trait-like stability by integrating valence estimates across all emotional conditions. Materials and methods: Healthy young adults in Japan (N = 40) completed two facial expression recording sessions separated by 30 min. Positive, neutral, and negative facial expression conditions were recorded using an AI-based system. Test–retest reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman analyses. To examine short-term trait-like stability across conditions, all condition-specific valence values were additionally integrated into a single dataset for each participant. Results: The ICC values were 0.82, 0.61, and 0.05 for the positive, negative, and neutral conditions, respectively. Bland–Altman analyses indicated no notable systematic bias across sessions. When data from all conditions were combined, the integrated dataset yielded a high ICC of 0.94, indicating short-term trait-like stability. Conclusions: AI-based emotional valence values showed good to moderate reproducibility for positive and negative expressions, whereas the neutral condition showed low ICC values, likely because of restricted score variability. Integrating valence data across conditions yielded a high ICC, indicating short-term trait-like stability at the individual level. These findings support the potential of AI-based valence as a low-burden measure for future research on emotional assessment in digital environments. However, further validation under ecologically valid real-world conditions is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/mhealthwellb8275
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI facial expression valence: reproducibility in healthy Japanese adults for digital environments

Kazuya Saita, Satoru Amano, Shota Yoshihara, Kayoko Takahashi
Academia Mental Health and Well-Being
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

AI facial expression valence: reproducibility in healthy Japanese adults for digital environments

Kazuya Saita, Satoru Amano, Shota Yoshihara, Kayoko Takahashi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based facial expression analysis can estimate emotional valence rapidly and noninvasively without the need for human training. However, reproducibility data remain limited, particularly in East Asian populations, where facial expressions may be more subtle. Establishing reproducibility in this context is essential for evaluating whether AI-derived valence measures may be useful in digital environments and mental health-related monitoring. Therefore, this study had two aims: (1) to evaluate state-specific reproducibility for positive, negative, and neutral facial expressions, and (2) to examine short-term trait-like stability by integrating valence estimates across all emotional conditions. Materials and methods: Healthy young adults in Japan (N = 40) completed two facial expression recording sessions separated by 30 min. Positive, neutral, and negative facial expression conditions were recorded using an AI-based system. Test–retest reproducibility was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman analyses. To examine short-term trait-like stability across conditions, all condition-specific valence values were additionally integrated into a single dataset for each participant. Results: The ICC values were 0.82, 0.61, and 0.05 for the positive, negative, and neutral conditions, respectively. Bland–Altman analyses indicated no notable systematic bias across sessions. When data from all conditions were combined, the integrated dataset yielded a high ICC of 0.94, indicating short-term trait-like stability. Conclusions: AI-based emotional valence values showed good to moderate reproducibility for positive and negative expressions, whereas the neutral condition showed low ICC values, likely because of restricted score variability. Integrating valence data across conditions yielded a high ICC, indicating short-term trait-like stability at the individual level. These findings support the potential of AI-based valence as a low-burden measure for future research on emotional assessment in digital environments. However, further validation under ecologically valid real-world conditions is needed.

Academia Mental Health and Well-BeingVol. 3(2)
Hiroshima University (JP), Kitasato University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.