Abortion care pathways in Addis Ababa healthcare facilities: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Understanding how women navigate induced abortion care pathways is critical to ensuring person-centred, quality reproductive health services. Evidence indicates that persistent abortion stigma, the lack of choices of abortion methods and respectful care during abortion remain a global challenge to reproductive healthcare. Yet there is minimal evidence regarding abortion care pathways. This study explored induced abortion care pathways in Addis Ababa healthcare facilities. METHODS: We used a descriptive qualitative approach, adopting purposive sampling techniques to recruit women who sought induced abortion care from seven facilities. The data were collected from May to July 2024. In-depth semi-structured interviews with sixteen women were digitally recorded and transcribed into the local language before being translated into English. Data were coded, organised, and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Five main themes and their corresponding subthemes were developed through data analysis. Themes were: (i) social and emotional support, (ii) moral and social meanings shaping abortion care, (iii) accessibility and service delivery, (iv) perceived competency of abortion providers, and (v) physical and emotional effects of abortion. Many women attended the clinic alone, without their families, and received no support. Women often sought care at clinics away from their community due to concerns related to fear of stigma and social pressure. This study found long waiting times to receive abortion care, a lack of medicine and ultrasound at some facilities and limited availability of second-trimester abortions. Women reported that many providers were welcoming and competent, while others reported poor communication, the use of medical jargon, and stigmatising behaviours. Participant reported pressure to accept methods they did not want during contraceptive counselling and fear of breaches in privacy and confidentiality. Participants also described physical symptoms such as bleeding and pain, and felt ashamed and upset after the abortion, which could be associated with negative experiences. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate social support, abortion stigma, and barriers to accessing abortion services, such as long waiting times and insufficient resources, were identified as significant gaps. These findings emphasised the need to strengthen person-centred abortion care and address systemic and socio-cultural barriers that undermine the quality of care.