Measuring pain in oral lichen planus: a comparative study of four assessment scales and their correlation

Oral lichen planus is a chronic disease of the oral mucosa, with pain as one of its main symptoms. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the results of four pain intensity measures-including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)- in a population of patients diagnosed with oral lichen planus. In this prospective observational study, 66 patients with oral lichen planus participated. Four pain assessment scales were used, including VAS, NRS, VRS, and SF-MPQ. Participants completed these assessments at baseline and again after two weeks of treatment. A paired t-test, Spearman correlation, linear regression analysis, and adjusted multiple regression analysis (regarding age and level of education) were used to analyze the data. All four scales were sensitive to changes in pain after treatment and a significant reduction in pain scores was observed (p < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between all scales (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that scores on each scale could significantly predict scores on the other scales (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and level of education, showed the correlations between the pain scales remained strong and significant (p < 0.001). These commonly used pain assessment scales showed strong correlation with each other, and it seems that the results obtained from each might be comparable with the others. However, further researches in larger studies and different populations are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51605-9
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring pain in oral lichen planus: a comparative study of four assessment scales and their correlation

Katayoun Katebi, Nasrin Sharififard, Maryam Farokhzadi, Parvin Sarbakhsh
Scientific Reports
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
article

Measuring pain in oral lichen planus: a comparative study of four assessment scales and their correlation

Katayoun Katebi, Nasrin Sharififard, Maryam Farokhzadi, Parvin Sarbakhsh
article en

Abstract

Oral lichen planus is a chronic disease of the oral mucosa, with pain as one of its main symptoms. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the results of four pain intensity measures-including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)- in a population of patients diagnosed with oral lichen planus. In this prospective observational study, 66 patients with oral lichen planus participated. Four pain assessment scales were used, including VAS, NRS, VRS, and SF-MPQ. Participants completed these assessments at baseline and again after two weeks of treatment. A paired t-test, Spearman correlation, linear regression analysis, and adjusted multiple regression analysis (regarding age and level of education) were used to analyze the data. All four scales were sensitive to changes in pain after treatment and a significant reduction in pain scores was observed (p < 0.001). There was a strong positive correlation between all scales (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that scores on each scale could significantly predict scores on the other scales (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis adjusted for age and level of education, showed the correlations between the pain scales remained strong and significant (p < 0.001). These commonly used pain assessment scales showed strong correlation with each other, and it seems that the results obtained from each might be comparable with the others. However, further researches in larger studies and different populations are needed.

Scientific Reports
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.