Neighborhood geographic disparities in colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancer risk in Alabama

PURPOSE: Incidence of common cancers has been rising in the U.S., with strong geographic variation in risk factors and incidence, particularly in the Southeast and in rural and high-poverty areas. Elevated cancer risk may translate into higher geographic concentrations of cancer survivors who require surveillance, follow-up care, and supportive services. Local geospatial assessment of cancer burden may inform both cancer prevention and survivorship planning. METHODS: We utilized adult (≥ 18 years) incident cases of colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancers from the 2010-2019 Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry data. We performed Bayesian disease mapping to estimate census tract-level relative risks (RRs) and classified tracts as hot and cold spots at 99% credible intervals (CrIs). Stratified analyses examined median RR differences by 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and 2010-2019 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) quartiles. RESULTS: We identified 7, 9, 3, and 83 hot-spot tracts for colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancer incidence, respectively. Colorectal hot spots were concentrated in rural southwestern Alabama; prostate cancer hot spots formed a band across south-central Alabama; breast cancer hot spots were localized to Huntsville and Birmingham; and lung cancer hot spots were widespread across rural areas. Increasing rurality was associated with higher median RRs for colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Neighborhood-level geographic disparities in cancer risk highlight areas with higher concentrations of cancer survivors with survivorship care needs. Linking geospatial incidence patterns with survivorship planning could support targeted strategies for surveillance, symptom management, psychosocial care, and health maintenance in high risk communities in the Deep South.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-026-02026-0
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neighborhood geographic disparities in colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancer risk in Alabama

Nashira I. Brown, Mackenzie Elisha Fowler, Timiya S. Nolan, Mahak Bhargava et al.
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
article

Neighborhood geographic disparities in colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancer risk in Alabama

Nashira I. Brown, Mackenzie Elisha Fowler, Timiya S. Nolan, Mahak Bhargava, Hayden D. Reeves, S M Qasim Hussaini, Ritu Aneja, BTech, R Blake Buchalter
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Incidence of common cancers has been rising in the U.S., with strong geographic variation in risk factors and incidence, particularly in the Southeast and in rural and high-poverty areas. Elevated cancer risk may translate into higher geographic concentrations of cancer survivors who require surveillance, follow-up care, and supportive services. Local geospatial assessment of cancer burden may inform both cancer prevention and survivorship planning. METHODS: We utilized adult (≥ 18 years) incident cases of colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancers from the 2010-2019 Alabama Statewide Cancer Registry data. We performed Bayesian disease mapping to estimate census tract-level relative risks (RRs) and classified tracts as hot and cold spots at 99% credible intervals (CrIs). Stratified analyses examined median RR differences by 2010 Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and 2010-2019 Area Deprivation Index (ADI) quartiles. RESULTS: We identified 7, 9, 3, and 83 hot-spot tracts for colorectal, prostate, breast, and lung cancer incidence, respectively. Colorectal hot spots were concentrated in rural southwestern Alabama; prostate cancer hot spots formed a band across south-central Alabama; breast cancer hot spots were localized to Huntsville and Birmingham; and lung cancer hot spots were widespread across rural areas. Increasing rurality was associated with higher median RRs for colorectal, prostate, and lung cancers. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Neighborhood-level geographic disparities in cancer risk highlight areas with higher concentrations of cancer survivors with survivorship care needs. Linking geospatial incidence patterns with survivorship planning could support targeted strategies for surveillance, symptom management, psychosocial care, and health maintenance in high risk communities in the Deep South.

Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Alabama Department of Public Health (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Breast Cancer Research Foundation of Alabama, National Cancer Institute
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.