Interpreting Himalaya Clauses Under Multimodal Carriage: A Comparative Study of International Conventions, English Law and New UAE Maritime Law

This paper is an insightful exploration of the intricate relationship between applicable law and the scope of Himalaya Clauses in the context of the carriage of goods by sea, particularly in their application to specific third parties engaged in the multimodal carriage of goods. Himalaya Clauses are provisions that are commonly found in contracts of carriage for goods transported by sea. These clauses are specifically designed to extend the limitation of liability benefits accorded to contracting maritime carriers to third parties involved in the transportation process. This arrangement guarantees that all parties potentially affected by the carrier's actions can also avail themselves of the liability protections specified in the contract. This paper adopts a qualitative legal and black letter approaches, applying a critical analysis to the pertinent provisions of the newly enacted UAE Maritime Law 2023 (UAEML), English law, and key international conventions and instruments that govern the contractual relationships between parties to contracts of carriage of goods by sea. Additionally, it examines relevant case law and precedents that address the scope of applicability of Himalaya Clauses. By shedding light on the discrepancies between these legal frameworks, this study emphasizes the challenges encountered in the evolution and practical application of Himalaya Clauses, whether concerning contracting parties, their agents, their servants, or independent contractors. The paper outlines the inconsistency in the provisions of the Rotterdam Rules 2008 and the UAEML with respect to the primary objective behind the innovation of Himalaya Clauses in shipping. With a commitment to fostering clarity and cohesion, the paper proposes thoughtful recommendations designed to bridge these gaps. Such efforts are not merely academic; they aspire to promote harmonization within the shipping industry and enhance the efficiency of the multimodal carriage of goods, ultimately contributing to a more streamlined and effective transportation landscape.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Transactions on Maritime Science
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v15.n01.011
Primary Topic
Law, logistics, and international trade
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpreting Himalaya Clauses Under Multimodal Carriage: A Comparative Study of International Conventions, English Law and New UAE Maritime Law

Derar Al-Daboubi
Transactions on Maritime Science
Law, logistics, and international trade
article

Interpreting Himalaya Clauses Under Multimodal Carriage: A Comparative Study of International Conventions, English Law and New UAE Maritime Law

Derar Al-Daboubi
article en

Abstract

This paper is an insightful exploration of the intricate relationship between applicable law and the scope of Himalaya Clauses in the context of the carriage of goods by sea, particularly in their application to specific third parties engaged in the multimodal carriage of goods. Himalaya Clauses are provisions that are commonly found in contracts of carriage for goods transported by sea. These clauses are specifically designed to extend the limitation of liability benefits accorded to contracting maritime carriers to third parties involved in the transportation process. This arrangement guarantees that all parties potentially affected by the carrier's actions can also avail themselves of the liability protections specified in the contract. This paper adopts a qualitative legal and black letter approaches, applying a critical analysis to the pertinent provisions of the newly enacted UAE Maritime Law 2023 (UAEML), English law, and key international conventions and instruments that govern the contractual relationships between parties to contracts of carriage of goods by sea. Additionally, it examines relevant case law and precedents that address the scope of applicability of Himalaya Clauses. By shedding light on the discrepancies between these legal frameworks, this study emphasizes the challenges encountered in the evolution and practical application of Himalaya Clauses, whether concerning contracting parties, their agents, their servants, or independent contractors. The paper outlines the inconsistency in the provisions of the Rotterdam Rules 2008 and the UAEML with respect to the primary objective behind the innovation of Himalaya Clauses in shipping. With a commitment to fostering clarity and cohesion, the paper proposes thoughtful recommendations designed to bridge these gaps. Such efforts are not merely academic; they aspire to promote harmonization within the shipping industry and enhance the efficiency of the multimodal carriage of goods, ultimately contributing to a more streamlined and effective transportation landscape.

Transactions on Maritime ScienceVol. 15(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Law, logistics, and international trade
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.