Clinical value and safety of liver biopsy in patients with liver failure

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety, etiological diagnostic value, and impact on clinical treatment decisions of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) in patients with liver failure. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with liver failure who underwent liver biopsy between January 1, 2017, and November 30, 2025. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, post-procedural adverse events, and pathological diagnoses were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with liver failure were included, comprising 40 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and 13 patients with acute or subacute liver failure. 13 patients received TJLB, all of whom had ACLF. Compared with the PLB, patients in the TJLB group had a higher international normalized ratio (INR) [1.61 (1.32, 1.98)], a lower platelet count (PLT) [89.00 (73.00, 129.00) × 10⁹/L], and were more frequently complicated by moderate to large ascites. Both PLB and TJLB were successfully performed, with a low overall complication rate and no serious adverse events. Even among patients with marked coagulation abnormalities or concomitant ascites, TJLB demonstrated acceptable safety. Histopathological examination following liver biopsy enables reclassification of both chronic liver disease etiologies and acute precipitating factors in patients with ACLF, as well as etiological diagnoses in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) or subacute liver failure (SALF). A substantial proportion of drug- or toxin-related acute liver injury was identified by histopathological examination (n = 32, 60%), leading to a decreased proportion of liver failure with unclear etiology. Based on the pathological diagnosis, treatment strategies were modified in 11% of patients, including the initiation or continuation of specific therapeutic regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with liver failure, liver biopsy provides crucial information for determining the etiology and guiding clinical decision-making. With appropriate selection of the biopsy approach and patient population, TJLB can serve as a safe and feasible option, particularly for patients with coagulation disorders or severe ascites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04863-w
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical value and safety of liver biopsy in patients with liver failure

J Jiao, Rui Zhao, M M Xu, Yongping Zhang et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Clinical value and safety of liver biopsy in patients with liver failure

J Jiao, Rui Zhao, M M Xu, Yongping Zhang, Yu Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the safety, etiological diagnostic value, and impact on clinical treatment decisions of transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) and percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) in patients with liver failure. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with liver failure who underwent liver biopsy between January 1, 2017, and November 30, 2025. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, post-procedural adverse events, and pathological diagnoses were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with liver failure were included, comprising 40 patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) and 13 patients with acute or subacute liver failure. 13 patients received TJLB, all of whom had ACLF. Compared with the PLB, patients in the TJLB group had a higher international normalized ratio (INR) [1.61 (1.32, 1.98)], a lower platelet count (PLT) [89.00 (73.00, 129.00) × 10⁹/L], and were more frequently complicated by moderate to large ascites. Both PLB and TJLB were successfully performed, with a low overall complication rate and no serious adverse events. Even among patients with marked coagulation abnormalities or concomitant ascites, TJLB demonstrated acceptable safety. Histopathological examination following liver biopsy enables reclassification of both chronic liver disease etiologies and acute precipitating factors in patients with ACLF, as well as etiological diagnoses in patients with acute liver failure (ALF) or subacute liver failure (SALF). A substantial proportion of drug- or toxin-related acute liver injury was identified by histopathological examination (n = 32, 60%), leading to a decreased proportion of liver failure with unclear etiology. Based on the pathological diagnosis, treatment strategies were modified in 11% of patients, including the initiation or continuation of specific therapeutic regimens. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with liver failure, liver biopsy provides crucial information for determining the etiology and guiding clinical decision-making. With appropriate selection of the biopsy approach and patient population, TJLB can serve as a safe and feasible option, particularly for patients with coagulation disorders or severe ascites.

BMC Gastroenterology
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (CN), People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (CN), Beijing YouAn Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.