Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment with different extraction protocols for maxillary canines: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) reflects localized periodontal and alveolar bone remodeling during orthodontic tooth movement. Although ALP changes have been investigated during leveling and alignment or active orthodontic movement, the biological impact of tooth extraction timing relative to orthodontic force application remains insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare ALP activity in gingival crevicular fluid between different extraction protocols in maxillary canines over a 6-week period. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in ALP activity across repeated time points. METHODS: Sixty patients with moderate maxillary crowding were randomly allocated, using concealed allocation into three equal groups: Group A (leveling and alignment only with delayed extraction), Group B (extraction only), and Group C (simultaneous extraction with leveling and alignment). GCF samples were collected weekly from Mesial and Distal sites of maxillary canines from baseline to week six. ALP activity was quantified using a spectrophotometric method. Data distribution was assessed prior to analysis. Due to predominantly non-normal distributions, non-parametric tests were primarily applied, including Friedman's test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test for intergroup comparisons, with appropriate post-hoc analyses. RESULTS: Distinct temporal patterns of ALP activity were observed across the three groups. Group B (extraction only) demonstrated the highest ALP activity during the early time points, particularly at weeks 1-3, while Group C showed intermediate responses and Group A exhibited consistently lower levels. At T1, significant intergroup differences were observed. At Mesial sites, Group C showed higher ALP activity than Group A (mean difference: 0.59 IU/L), followed by Group B (mean difference: 0.28 IU/L compared with Group A; p < 0.05). At Distal sites, Group B demonstrated the highest ALP activity compared to Group A (mean difference: 1.00 IU/L; p < 0.01), with Group C showing intermediate values compared with Group A (mean difference: 0.73 IU/L). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth extraction was associated with increased ALP activity in gingival crevicular fluid during the early phase of orthodontic treatment. Variations in ALP patterns between extraction protocols indicate that extraction timing modulates early biochemical responses in periodontal tissues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BDJ Open
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-026-00425-0
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment with different extraction protocols for maxillary canines: a randomized controlled trial

Yahya Dakdouk, Shadi Azzawi, Kindah Sultan
BDJ Open
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Alkaline phosphatase activity in gingival crevicular fluid during orthodontic treatment with different extraction protocols for maxillary canines: a randomized controlled trial

Yahya Dakdouk, Shadi Azzawi, Kindah Sultan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) reflects localized periodontal and alveolar bone remodeling during orthodontic tooth movement. Although ALP changes have been investigated during leveling and alignment or active orthodontic movement, the biological impact of tooth extraction timing relative to orthodontic force application remains insufficiently characterized. OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare ALP activity in gingival crevicular fluid between different extraction protocols in maxillary canines over a 6-week period. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in ALP activity across repeated time points. METHODS: Sixty patients with moderate maxillary crowding were randomly allocated, using concealed allocation into three equal groups: Group A (leveling and alignment only with delayed extraction), Group B (extraction only), and Group C (simultaneous extraction with leveling and alignment). GCF samples were collected weekly from Mesial and Distal sites of maxillary canines from baseline to week six. ALP activity was quantified using a spectrophotometric method. Data distribution was assessed prior to analysis. Due to predominantly non-normal distributions, non-parametric tests were primarily applied, including Friedman's test for intragroup comparisons and Kruskal-Wallis test for intergroup comparisons, with appropriate post-hoc analyses. RESULTS: Distinct temporal patterns of ALP activity were observed across the three groups. Group B (extraction only) demonstrated the highest ALP activity during the early time points, particularly at weeks 1-3, while Group C showed intermediate responses and Group A exhibited consistently lower levels. At T1, significant intergroup differences were observed. At Mesial sites, Group C showed higher ALP activity than Group A (mean difference: 0.59 IU/L), followed by Group B (mean difference: 0.28 IU/L compared with Group A; p < 0.05). At Distal sites, Group B demonstrated the highest ALP activity compared to Group A (mean difference: 1.00 IU/L; p < 0.01), with Group C showing intermediate values compared with Group A (mean difference: 0.73 IU/L). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth extraction was associated with increased ALP activity in gingival crevicular fluid during the early phase of orthodontic treatment. Variations in ALP patterns between extraction protocols indicate that extraction timing modulates early biochemical responses in periodontal tissues.

BDJ OpenVol. 12(1)
Damascus University (SY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.