Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition by gender identity and sexual orientation: a survey of nursing students.

Objective: Amid growing calls for respect for gender diversity, Japanese law restricts midwifery qualifications to women, excluding individuals assigned male at birth. By contrast, in some countries, all individuals can pursue midwifery qualifications regardless of gender. These differences highlight varying institutional frameworks and levels of social acceptance. To clarify nursing students' acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition across gender identities and sexual orientations. Methods: tests. Results: Heterosexual women had the highest level of acceptance (96.9% positive evaluations), while heterosexual and bisexual men had the lowest (46.9%). There were substantial gender differences in the level of acceptance for different sexual orientations; however, none were statistically significant. Conclusion: Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition varied by gender identity and sexual orientation categories, suggesting that gender roles and cultural perspectives may influence attitudes. The findings indicate that systems should be reviewed to allow anyone, regardless of gender, to qualify and work as a midwife. They also highlight the importance of fostering an understanding of diversity through education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2025-024
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition by gender identity and sexual orientation: a survey of nursing students.

Hironori Tsuzuki, Keisuke Iwase, Mikiko Shimizu
PubMed
Nursing education and management
article

Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition by gender identity and sexual orientation: a survey of nursing students.

Hironori Tsuzuki, Keisuke Iwase, Mikiko Shimizu
article en

Abstract

Objective: Amid growing calls for respect for gender diversity, Japanese law restricts midwifery qualifications to women, excluding individuals assigned male at birth. By contrast, in some countries, all individuals can pursue midwifery qualifications regardless of gender. These differences highlight varying institutional frameworks and levels of social acceptance. To clarify nursing students' acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition across gender identities and sexual orientations. Methods: tests. Results: Heterosexual women had the highest level of acceptance (96.9% positive evaluations), while heterosexual and bisexual men had the lowest (46.9%). There were substantial gender differences in the level of acceptance for different sexual orientations; however, none were statistically significant. Conclusion: Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition varied by gender identity and sexual orientation categories, suggesting that gender roles and cultural perspectives may influence attitudes. The findings indicate that systems should be reviewed to allow anyone, regardless of gender, to qualify and work as a midwife. They also highlight the importance of fostering an understanding of diversity through education.

PubMedVol. 12(2)
Fujita Health University (JP), Toyohashi SOZO University (JP)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acceptance of midwifery qualification acquisition by gender identity and sexual orientation: a survey of nursing students. — Hironori Tsuzuki, Keisuke Iwase, et al. · PubMed (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS