A Meaning-Making Conversation: A Formative Mixed Method Pilot Study of a Brief Intervention for Patients Living Long-Term With Incurable Cancer

BackgroundMany patients with incurable cancer are expected to live for a considerable period of time, yet with the knowledge of their disease's inevitable end-of-life outcome. This duality can lead to existential concerns. A single one-hour meaning-making conversation was developed in which a patient explores their sources of meaning together with a spiritual counselor.AimTo explore how patients experience and benefit from a conversation aimed at supporting meaning-making, in order to inform further refinement of this intervention.DesignWe conducted a formative mixed method pilot study. Evaluation interviews assessed patients' experience and reported benefits. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Key themes were compared and contrasted by intervention timing and patients' experience of existential concerns. Validated questionnaires were administered to assess patients' existential wellbeing, problems, and needs pre- and post-intervention.Setting/ParticipantsTwenty-one patients with advanced solid malignancies and a prognosis >1 year participated at two different hospitals.ResultsAll patients experiencing existential concerns appreciated the meaning-making conversation and reported benefits, such as reflection, validation, insight and actions related to sources of meaning. Half of the those not experiencing existential concerns reported no benefits, and some reported a negative experience. Quantitative data suggest a decrease in most existential problems and needs post-intervention. Existential wellbeing increased post-intervention.ConclusionsA meaning-making conversation can support the process of meaning-making for patients living long-term with incurable cancer. Refinement of the intervention should focus on targeting patients experiencing existential concerns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261444921
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meaning-Making Conversation: A Formative Mixed Method Pilot Study of a Brief Intervention for Patients Living Long-Term With Incurable Cancer

Anna Visser, Lenneke Post, J Dekker, Lia van Zuylen et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

A Meaning-Making Conversation: A Formative Mixed Method Pilot Study of a Brief Intervention for Patients Living Long-Term With Incurable Cancer

Anna Visser, Lenneke Post, J Dekker, Lia van Zuylen, Inge R Konings
article en

Abstract

BackgroundMany patients with incurable cancer are expected to live for a considerable period of time, yet with the knowledge of their disease's inevitable end-of-life outcome. This duality can lead to existential concerns. A single one-hour meaning-making conversation was developed in which a patient explores their sources of meaning together with a spiritual counselor.AimTo explore how patients experience and benefit from a conversation aimed at supporting meaning-making, in order to inform further refinement of this intervention.DesignWe conducted a formative mixed method pilot study. Evaluation interviews assessed patients' experience and reported benefits. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Key themes were compared and contrasted by intervention timing and patients' experience of existential concerns. Validated questionnaires were administered to assess patients' existential wellbeing, problems, and needs pre- and post-intervention.Setting/ParticipantsTwenty-one patients with advanced solid malignancies and a prognosis >1 year participated at two different hospitals.ResultsAll patients experiencing existential concerns appreciated the meaning-making conversation and reported benefits, such as reflection, validation, insight and actions related to sources of meaning. Half of the those not experiencing existential concerns reported no benefits, and some reported a negative experience. Quantitative data suggest a decrease in most existential problems and needs post-intervention. Existential wellbeing increased post-intervention.ConclusionsA meaning-making conversation can support the process of meaning-making for patients living long-term with incurable cancer. Refinement of the intervention should focus on targeting patients experiencing existential concerns.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Cancer Center Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Gilead Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.