A dynamic approach to unmet needs in long-term care for older people across Europe

Abstract Background and Objectives Studies on unmet needs in long-term care (LTC) have focused on specific time points and have not adopted a dynamic approach that considers changes over time. This study examined the trajectories of unmet needs for care and support with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) among adults aged 50+ across European countries up to nine years after the onset of needs. Research Design and Methods Using the longitudinal data from the SHARE survey (2011-2022; n = 6,154), we used Latent Profile Analysis to identify five trajectory types defined by time until onset of unmet needs, number of changes of state, time spent with unmet needs, ADL/IADL limitations, and age at onset of needs. These trajectories are marked by early periods of unmet needs (Short Delayed Met Needs; Long Delayed Met Needs; High Needs and Delayed), ambivalent (U-shaped Met Needs), or outright positive (Met Needs From Onset). Results An overwhelming majority of older adults experienced unmet needs at some point after the onset of needs. Multivariate analysis shows that having a cohabiting spouse/partner and higher income are associated with trajectories where care is available early on. Country-level public expenditure on LTC is also a strong determinant of belonging to different trajectories. We further explored the association between these trajectories and mortality and ADL/IADL limitations. Discussion and Implications Results confirm the relevance of transition points, such as the time around the onset of needs, highlighting the potential role for case management and discharge teams at such transitions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation in Aging
Published
2026-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igag042
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A dynamic approach to unmet needs in long-term care for older people across Europe

Victoria Kontrus, Susana Ramalho Marques, Rebekka Steinlechner, Stefan Hopf et al.
Innovation in Aging
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

A dynamic approach to unmet needs in long-term care for older people across Europe

Victoria Kontrus, Susana Ramalho Marques, Rebekka Steinlechner, Stefan Hopf, Ricardo Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Studies on unmet needs in long-term care (LTC) have focused on specific time points and have not adopted a dynamic approach that considers changes over time. This study examined the trajectories of unmet needs for care and support with activities of daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) among adults aged 50+ across European countries up to nine years after the onset of needs. Research Design and Methods Using the longitudinal data from the SHARE survey (2011-2022; n = 6,154), we used Latent Profile Analysis to identify five trajectory types defined by time until onset of unmet needs, number of changes of state, time spent with unmet needs, ADL/IADL limitations, and age at onset of needs. These trajectories are marked by early periods of unmet needs (Short Delayed Met Needs; Long Delayed Met Needs; High Needs and Delayed), ambivalent (U-shaped Met Needs), or outright positive (Met Needs From Onset). Results An overwhelming majority of older adults experienced unmet needs at some point after the onset of needs. Multivariate analysis shows that having a cohabiting spouse/partner and higher income are associated with trajectories where care is available early on. Country-level public expenditure on LTC is also a strong determinant of belonging to different trajectories. We further explored the association between these trajectories and mortality and ADL/IADL limitations. Discussion and Implications Results confirm the relevance of transition points, such as the time around the onset of needs, highlighting the potential role for case management and discharge teams at such transitions.

Innovation in Aging
University of Lisbon (PT), Arge Vegetationsökologie und Landschaftsplanung (AT), Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences (AT)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.