Context-tuned strategies for marker selection precision in neuronal studies

Marker selection precision in neuronal studies is critical for reliable neuron identification. However, it largely depends on the experimental context. Variations in neuronal marker specificity across experimental models, neuronal maturation stages, and neurotransmitter phenotypes have highlighted the vitality of implementing “context-tuned” strategies in marker selection. Neuronal markers arise from canonical protein-coding genes, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), isoform-specific variants, neurotransmitters, and numerous metabolic signatures. Here, we emphasize protein-coding genes as markers because of their wide availability, ease of interpretation, and compatibility with standard detection methods like qPCR, in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry, and Western blotting. They are also directly linked to cellular structures, signaling pathways, functional importance, and are adaptable across different platforms. We aim to guide the strategic selection and application of neuronal markers to maximize accuracy and interpretive confidence across diverse experimental systems. The review addresses the molecular origin and nature of neuronal markers, their specific applications, including distinguishing neuronal from non-neuronal cells in tissue or histological preparations, identifying neurotransmitter phenotypes in neuronal cultures and tissues, evaluating neuronal maturity in progenitor-derived systems, discriminating between immature and fully differentiated neurons in vitro , and detecting neurons alongside other neuronal or non-neuronal subtypes in mixed populations. Furthermore, it emphasizes positive and negative marker strategies, accounting for developmental timing, cellular specificity, model system differences, and rigorous exclusion of unintended cell types. Through this comprehensive review, we deliver a simplified reference for neuroscientists seeking to enhance the accuracy, specificity, and reproducibility of their neurobiological studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2026.1773103
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Context-tuned strategies for marker selection precision in neuronal studies

M N Kim, D. Chanuka M. Kulatunga
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Context-tuned strategies for marker selection precision in neuronal studies

M N Kim, D. Chanuka M. Kulatunga
article en

Abstract

Marker selection precision in neuronal studies is critical for reliable neuron identification. However, it largely depends on the experimental context. Variations in neuronal marker specificity across experimental models, neuronal maturation stages, and neurotransmitter phenotypes have highlighted the vitality of implementing “context-tuned” strategies in marker selection. Neuronal markers arise from canonical protein-coding genes, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), isoform-specific variants, neurotransmitters, and numerous metabolic signatures. Here, we emphasize protein-coding genes as markers because of their wide availability, ease of interpretation, and compatibility with standard detection methods like qPCR, in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry, and Western blotting. They are also directly linked to cellular structures, signaling pathways, functional importance, and are adaptable across different platforms. We aim to guide the strategic selection and application of neuronal markers to maximize accuracy and interpretive confidence across diverse experimental systems. The review addresses the molecular origin and nature of neuronal markers, their specific applications, including distinguishing neuronal from non-neuronal cells in tissue or histological preparations, identifying neurotransmitter phenotypes in neuronal cultures and tissues, evaluating neuronal maturity in progenitor-derived systems, discriminating between immature and fully differentiated neurons in vitro , and detecting neurons alongside other neuronal or non-neuronal subtypes in mixed populations. Furthermore, it emphasizes positive and negative marker strategies, accounting for developmental timing, cellular specificity, model system differences, and rigorous exclusion of unintended cell types. Through this comprehensive review, we deliver a simplified reference for neuroscientists seeking to enhance the accuracy, specificity, and reproducibility of their neurobiological studies.

Frontiers in NeuroscienceVol. 20
Chungnam National University (KR)
National Research Foundation of Korea
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Context-tuned strategies for marker selection precision in neuronal studies — M N Kim, D. Chanuka M. Kulatunga · Frontiers in Neuroscience (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS