BISHAL NEUPANE'S OSCILLATING COSMOLOGICAL MODEL IN CONFRONTATION WITH THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of sinusoidal cosmology, cosmic cycles, non-singular origin, modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmol

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Bishal Neupane’s Oscillating Cosmological Model in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis examines Neupane’s sinusoidal cosmological proposal, based on the scale factor , as a non-singular cyclic model of the universe involving alternating phases of expansion, contraction, acceleration, and deceleration. The paper evaluates the possible compatibilities and tensions between Neupane’s oscillating cosmology and the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding the rejection of an absolute cosmological singularity, the role of mathematical structure, the existence of phase boundaries, the interpretation of cosmic cycles, and the need for a deeper ontological foundation. It also articulates the discussion with the phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity, and the concept of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation. The article argues that Neupane’s model offers a relevant cosmological interlocution with the Theory of Objectivity because it proposes a cyclic and non-singular universe. However, it also identifies important limitations, especially the absence of a modal derivation of the sinusoidal scale factor, the lack of an ontology of elements, the absence of a theory of relational observation, and the lack of an explicit treatment of information as a substance transcendent to the quantum. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Bishaloscillating universecyclic cosmology; sinusoidal cosmology; non-singular universe; scale factor; modal ontology; cosmological Eras; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; cosmogonic theorem; transcendent information; atomic radiation; Big Bang alternatives; critical–propositional analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19991181
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BISHAL NEUPANE'S OSCILLATING COSMOLOGICAL MODEL IN CONFRONTATION WITH THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of sinusoidal cosmology, cosmic cycles, non-singular origin, modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmol

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

BISHAL NEUPANE'S OSCILLATING COSMOLOGICAL MODEL IN CONFRONTATION WITH THE THEORY OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of sinusoidal cosmology, cosmic cycles, non-singular origin, modal axioms, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmol

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Bishal Neupane’s Oscillating Cosmological Model in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis examines Neupane’s sinusoidal cosmological proposal, based on the scale factor , as a non-singular cyclic model of the universe involving alternating phases of expansion, contraction, acceleration, and deceleration. The paper evaluates the possible compatibilities and tensions between Neupane’s oscillating cosmology and the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding the rejection of an absolute cosmological singularity, the role of mathematical structure, the existence of phase boundaries, the interpretation of cosmic cycles, and the need for a deeper ontological foundation. It also articulates the discussion with the phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity, and the concept of the transcendent element as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiation. The article argues that Neupane’s model offers a relevant cosmological interlocution with the Theory of Objectivity because it proposes a cyclic and non-singular universe. However, it also identifies important limitations, especially the absence of a modal derivation of the sinusoidal scale factor, the lack of an ontology of elements, the absence of a theory of relational observation, and the lack of an explicit treatment of information as a substance transcendent to the quantum. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Bishaloscillating universecyclic cosmology; sinusoidal cosmology; non-singular universe; scale factor; modal ontology; cosmological Eras; Inducer Effects; phenomenic elements; cosmogonic theorem; transcendent information; atomic radiation; Big Bang alternatives; critical–propositional analysis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.