AHP-QFD multi-objective decision analysis of smart wearable material comfort in virtual reality environments

The user experience of virtual reality (VR) devices is restricted by heat accumulation, pressure on the face, and a lack of tactile feedback from the materials. Long periods of use lead to thermal and moisture imbalances and structural compression since the way the materials interact with the human micro-environment creates these issues. In this paper, a new decision-making methodology is presented that applies a multi-objective conflict solution approach that integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). The core user comfort requirement weights were generated through the AHP method. Using QFD, these weights were mapped directly to the technical material properties, and their relative importance was ranked (the top three being fiber diameter ≤10 μm, thermal conductivity ≥5 W/m K, and bending stiffness ≤10 mN m). A Pareto front analysis was used to create a balance of conflicting objectives and direct the development of a collaborative optimization solution. Experimental validation of the optimized solution (a polyester-viscose blended substrate with plasma treatment, a graphene thermal conductive layer, and a gradient support structure) results in significant increases in overall user experience comfort. There was a decrease in microenvironment temperature rise by 35.8%, from 8.1 to 5.2 °C (compared to the unoptimized group), as well as a decrease in subjective thermal discomfort score by 39.5%, from 3.8 to 2.3. In addition, bending stiffness decreased to 33% (8.4 mN m), effective load-bearing nodes increased to 92.3% (13% increase), and peak pressure in the nose pad area decreased by 50% (half). Although there was an 8.9% increase in manufacturing costs, overall user satisfaction was improved by 40.6%, and ROI increased to 4.39, indicating that the framework provided was effective for achieving thermal, moisture, and force multiphysics comfort and cost constraint objectives. This paper presented a systematic multi-objective decision-making process for designing comfortable VR wearable materials and identified an engineering path for optimizing materials, processes, and structures in a coordinated manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIP Advances
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0299509
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AHP-QFD multi-objective decision analysis of smart wearable material comfort in virtual reality environments

Jiaji Zhou, Yufan Wen, Qinyu Bai, Yanan Xu
AIP Advances
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

AHP-QFD multi-objective decision analysis of smart wearable material comfort in virtual reality environments

Jiaji Zhou, Yufan Wen, Qinyu Bai, Yanan Xu
article en

Abstract

The user experience of virtual reality (VR) devices is restricted by heat accumulation, pressure on the face, and a lack of tactile feedback from the materials. Long periods of use lead to thermal and moisture imbalances and structural compression since the way the materials interact with the human micro-environment creates these issues. In this paper, a new decision-making methodology is presented that applies a multi-objective conflict solution approach that integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). The core user comfort requirement weights were generated through the AHP method. Using QFD, these weights were mapped directly to the technical material properties, and their relative importance was ranked (the top three being fiber diameter ≤10 μm, thermal conductivity ≥5 W/m K, and bending stiffness ≤10 mN m). A Pareto front analysis was used to create a balance of conflicting objectives and direct the development of a collaborative optimization solution. Experimental validation of the optimized solution (a polyester-viscose blended substrate with plasma treatment, a graphene thermal conductive layer, and a gradient support structure) results in significant increases in overall user experience comfort. There was a decrease in microenvironment temperature rise by 35.8%, from 8.1 to 5.2 °C (compared to the unoptimized group), as well as a decrease in subjective thermal discomfort score by 39.5%, from 3.8 to 2.3. In addition, bending stiffness decreased to 33% (8.4 mN m), effective load-bearing nodes increased to 92.3% (13% increase), and peak pressure in the nose pad area decreased by 50% (half). Although there was an 8.9% increase in manufacturing costs, overall user satisfaction was improved by 40.6%, and ROI increased to 4.39, indicating that the framework provided was effective for achieving thermal, moisture, and force multiphysics comfort and cost constraint objectives. This paper presented a systematic multi-objective decision-making process for designing comfortable VR wearable materials and identified an engineering path for optimizing materials, processes, and structures in a coordinated manner.

AIP AdvancesVol. 16(5)
Dong-Eui University (KR), Jilin College of the Arts (CN), Jilin Vocational College of Industry and Technology (CN), Hebei Science and Technology Department (CN), PLA Air Force Aviation University (CN), Xingtai University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.