Utility of point-of-care platelet aggregation testing for transfusion prediction

Early identification and initiation of therapy for life-threatening hemorrhage is essential to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. In primary hemostasis, platelet function is integral to reach this goal, but major hemorrhage leads to impaired platelet mechanical activation and aggregation. Current devices for measuring platelet function are cumbersome or not promptly available for clinical decision making in this setting. Within this manuscript we prospectively evaluate a novel, rapid assay utilizing measures of platelet aggregation to predict hemorrhage. In this prospective cohort study at an academic regional Level I trauma center, we included adult (> 16 years old) participants who were triaged as level I or II trauma activations. The primary exposure studied was platelet aggregation analyzed on a prototype device. The primary and secondary outcomes measured were life-threatening hemorrhage (death from hemorrhage or need for hemorrhage control procedure) and transfusion requirements of > 2 units of blood components, respectively. Standard descriptive statistics were used to characterize the cohort. Predictive outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression to compare: (1) the platelet aggregation assay; (2) clinical parameters (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and injury mechanism); and (3) a combined model. Of 761 patients, 482 patients met inclusion criteria for our study, 36 (7.5%) had life-threatening hemorrhage and 43 (8.9%) patients required > 2 units of blood transfusion. For life-threatening hemorrhage, platelet aggregation had an area under the curve (AUC): 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.69); clinical parameters AUC: 0.83 (CI 0.75-0.91); and the combined model AUC: 0.85 (CI 0.79-0.92) which was not significantly improved when compared to clinical parameters alone (p = 0.32). For transfusion of > 2 units, the platelet aggregation model had AUC: 0.68 (CI 0.61-0.76); clinical parameters AUC: 0.84 (CI 0.79-0.90); and combined model AUC: 0.88 (CI 0.83-0.93), improving transfusion prediction over clinical parameters alone (p = 0.013). In a cohort of traumatically injured patients, a novel, rapid measure of platelet aggregation enhanced well-established clinical parameters to predict the need for blood transfusion but not life-threatening hemorrhage. Future work should validate the clinical utility of this technology in a larger cohort and patients with significant non-traumatic hemorrhage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51134-5
Primary Topic
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of point-of-care platelet aggregation testing for transfusion prediction

Austin Limanek, Kevin High, Sally Dye, Shayan Rakhit et al.
Scientific Reports
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
article

Utility of point-of-care platelet aggregation testing for transfusion prediction

Austin Limanek, Kevin High, Sally Dye, Shayan Rakhit, Shannon Pugh, Lucas H. Ting, Cassandra Hennessy, Matthew Shotwell, Tyler J Murphy, Adam Turner, Karen Miller, Mayur B Patel, Joshua Lawrence, Pamela Watson, Sean Collins
article en

Abstract

Early identification and initiation of therapy for life-threatening hemorrhage is essential to minimize patient morbidity and mortality. In primary hemostasis, platelet function is integral to reach this goal, but major hemorrhage leads to impaired platelet mechanical activation and aggregation. Current devices for measuring platelet function are cumbersome or not promptly available for clinical decision making in this setting. Within this manuscript we prospectively evaluate a novel, rapid assay utilizing measures of platelet aggregation to predict hemorrhage. In this prospective cohort study at an academic regional Level I trauma center, we included adult (> 16 years old) participants who were triaged as level I or II trauma activations. The primary exposure studied was platelet aggregation analyzed on a prototype device. The primary and secondary outcomes measured were life-threatening hemorrhage (death from hemorrhage or need for hemorrhage control procedure) and transfusion requirements of > 2 units of blood components, respectively. Standard descriptive statistics were used to characterize the cohort. Predictive outcomes were analyzed using multivariable regression to compare: (1) the platelet aggregation assay; (2) clinical parameters (systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and injury mechanism); and (3) a combined model. Of 761 patients, 482 patients met inclusion criteria for our study, 36 (7.5%) had life-threatening hemorrhage and 43 (8.9%) patients required > 2 units of blood transfusion. For life-threatening hemorrhage, platelet aggregation had an area under the curve (AUC): 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.69); clinical parameters AUC: 0.83 (CI 0.75-0.91); and the combined model AUC: 0.85 (CI 0.79-0.92) which was not significantly improved when compared to clinical parameters alone (p = 0.32). For transfusion of > 2 units, the platelet aggregation model had AUC: 0.68 (CI 0.61-0.76); clinical parameters AUC: 0.84 (CI 0.79-0.90); and combined model AUC: 0.88 (CI 0.83-0.93), improving transfusion prediction over clinical parameters alone (p = 0.013). In a cohort of traumatically injured patients, a novel, rapid measure of platelet aggregation enhanced well-established clinical parameters to predict the need for blood transfusion but not life-threatening hemorrhage. Future work should validate the clinical utility of this technology in a larger cohort and patients with significant non-traumatic hemorrhage.

Scientific Reports
Vanderbilt University (US), Stasys Medical (United States) (US), VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System (US), Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.