“One of the Least of These”: Unrepresented Patients and Christian Bioethics

Abstract Unrepresented patients cannot make their own medical decisions and do not have any surrogate decision-maker. This patient population is highly vulnerable to being harmed, wronged, ignored, and exploited. But the ethical issues related to their care have gotten little attention from Christian bioethicists, which is problematic in light of Christianity’s concern for the poor, the needy, and the vulnerable. This article claims that Christian bioethicists must address these issues, and that Christian morality demands an approach that is different from the status quo. First, it lays out moral principles pertaining to the care of unrepresented patients, focusing on the special obligation to prioritize and protect the vulnerable. Second, it applies these principles to one major ethical problem—the appropriate decision-maker for unrepresented patients—arguing that Christians should favor institutional committees instead of the conventional practices of courts and clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cb/cbaf024
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“One of the Least of These”: Unrepresented Patients and Christian Bioethics

Matthew Shea
Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

“One of the Least of These”: Unrepresented Patients and Christian Bioethics

Matthew Shea
article en

Abstract

Abstract Unrepresented patients cannot make their own medical decisions and do not have any surrogate decision-maker. This patient population is highly vulnerable to being harmed, wronged, ignored, and exploited. But the ethical issues related to their care have gotten little attention from Christian bioethicists, which is problematic in light of Christianity’s concern for the poor, the needy, and the vulnerable. This article claims that Christian bioethicists must address these issues, and that Christian morality demands an approach that is different from the status quo. First, it lays out moral principles pertaining to the care of unrepresented patients, focusing on the special obligation to prioritize and protect the vulnerable. Second, it applies these principles to one major ethical problem—the appropriate decision-maker for unrepresented patients—arguing that Christians should favor institutional committees instead of the conventional practices of courts and clinicians.

Christian bioethics Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.