The application of the wound protector device “lap-protector” in costal cartilage harvest for auricular reconstruction to improve outcomes

The study presents experience in using a wound protector device named lap-protector during costal cartilage harvest in auricular reconstruction in order to improve outcomes, particularly final scar quality and length. The present study retrospectively comprised fifty-five patients who underwent costal cartilage harvesting for auricular reconstruction were admitted between June to August 2022. The author divided the patients into 2 groups according to whether the lap-protector was used or not: group 1 underwent costal cartilage with the minimal invasive conventional technique by using the lap-protector, while group 2 underwent the same procedure without. Patients were followed-up for a 6-months period. The time of surgery, the amount of blood loss during surgery, postoperative pain, donor-site scar quality and length were recorded and measured for both groups. Twenty-five patients with lap-protector were compared to thirty without. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the demographic of patient characteristics (P > 0.05). The score of pain dropped steadily over the 5 days in both groups, and patients in group 1 reported a lower level of pain in the following days compared with group 2 (P < 0.05), except the fifth day. In those without, the length of the scar on average was 5.43 ± 0.44 cm, which was longer than the average 3.61 ± 0.29 cm in group 1 (P < 0.05). Analysis of VSS results showed a better formation of the scar in the group1 (P < 0.05). The differences in postoperative pain, scar length and quality between the two groups were statistically significant(P < 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of the operation time and the amount of bleeding during the operation (P > 0.05). The application of lap-protector in costal cartilage harvest can optimize the scar formation and reduce postoperative pain without prolonging the operative time, which is a convenient and effective technique for achieving satisfactory results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44983-7
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The application of the wound protector device “lap-protector” in costal cartilage harvest for auricular reconstruction to improve outcomes

Fan Guo, Changchen Wang, Jianwen Qu, Pengfei Sun et al.
Scientific Reports
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
article

The application of the wound protector device “lap-protector” in costal cartilage harvest for auricular reconstruction to improve outcomes

Fan Guo, Changchen Wang, Jianwen Qu, Pengfei Sun, Bo Pan
article en

Abstract

The study presents experience in using a wound protector device named lap-protector during costal cartilage harvest in auricular reconstruction in order to improve outcomes, particularly final scar quality and length. The present study retrospectively comprised fifty-five patients who underwent costal cartilage harvesting for auricular reconstruction were admitted between June to August 2022. The author divided the patients into 2 groups according to whether the lap-protector was used or not: group 1 underwent costal cartilage with the minimal invasive conventional technique by using the lap-protector, while group 2 underwent the same procedure without. Patients were followed-up for a 6-months period. The time of surgery, the amount of blood loss during surgery, postoperative pain, donor-site scar quality and length were recorded and measured for both groups. Twenty-five patients with lap-protector were compared to thirty without. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the demographic of patient characteristics (P > 0.05). The score of pain dropped steadily over the 5 days in both groups, and patients in group 1 reported a lower level of pain in the following days compared with group 2 (P < 0.05), except the fifth day. In those without, the length of the scar on average was 5.43 ± 0.44 cm, which was longer than the average 3.61 ± 0.29 cm in group 1 (P < 0.05). Analysis of VSS results showed a better formation of the scar in the group1 (P < 0.05). The differences in postoperative pain, scar length and quality between the two groups were statistically significant(P < 0.05). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of the operation time and the amount of bleeding during the operation (P > 0.05). The application of lap-protector in costal cartilage harvest can optimize the scar formation and reduce postoperative pain without prolonging the operative time, which is a convenient and effective technique for achieving satisfactory results.

Scientific Reports
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.