Computational precision control of electrospun polymer nanofiber morphology using machine learning and genetic algorithm optimization

Abstract Electrospinning offers exceptional flexibility in fabricating nanofibers, yet achieving precise control over fiber diameter, which is crucial for tailoring material properties, remains a challenge due to the complex and nonlinear interactions among various process parameters. This study presents a literature-derived, multi-material predictive-optimization strategy for the computational control of electrospun fiber diameter. A dataset containing 3000 data points was collected from published scientific research articles on electrospinning, covering a wide range of polymers, solvents, and process parameters, and was used to develop predictive machine learning (ML) models for fiber diameter prediction. Among the developed models, the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model performed best, achieving a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) value of 0.94 and delivering low prediction errors (root mean square error [RMSE]: 275.02 nm, mean absolute error [MAE]: 75.40 nm) on the unseen data. Experimental validation using polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanofibers showed close alignment between predicted and measured fiber diameters, supporting the practical reliability of the predictive model under real electrospinning conditions. To move beyond forward prediction, the trained XGB model was integrated with a genetic algorithm (GA) to enable surrogate-based inverse design of electrospinning parameters for user-defined target fiber diameters. The GA identified parameter combinations corresponding to target diameters between 100 nm and 4000 nm with low surrogate-model fitness errors. For target diameters of 400 nm and 600 nm, the GA achieved fitness errors of 0.03 nm and 0.35 nm, respectively. Furthermore, the integrated XGB-GA approach yielded a perfect linear correlation ( R 2 = 1.00) between the target fiber diameters and the predicted fiber diameters within the GA-optimized subset, demonstrating the effectiveness of the optimization strategy for precise diameter control across various electrospinning conditions. Overall, this study provides a data-driven approach for predicting fiber diameter and guiding electrospinning parameter selection while reducing dependence on trial-and-error experimentation within the material systems represented in the dataset. Graphical abstract

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Science
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-12821-w
Primary Topic
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational precision control of electrospun polymer nanofiber morphology using machine learning and genetic algorithm optimization

Eylem Asmatulu, Balakrishnan Subeshan
Journal of Materials Science
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
article

Computational precision control of electrospun polymer nanofiber morphology using machine learning and genetic algorithm optimization

Eylem Asmatulu, Balakrishnan Subeshan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Electrospinning offers exceptional flexibility in fabricating nanofibers, yet achieving precise control over fiber diameter, which is crucial for tailoring material properties, remains a challenge due to the complex and nonlinear interactions among various process parameters. This study presents a literature-derived, multi-material predictive-optimization strategy for the computational control of electrospun fiber diameter. A dataset containing 3000 data points was collected from published scientific research articles on electrospinning, covering a wide range of polymers, solvents, and process parameters, and was used to develop predictive machine learning (ML) models for fiber diameter prediction. Among the developed models, the extreme gradient boosting (XGB) model performed best, achieving a coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) value of 0.94 and delivering low prediction errors (root mean square error [RMSE]: 275.02 nm, mean absolute error [MAE]: 75.40 nm) on the unseen data. Experimental validation using polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanofibers showed close alignment between predicted and measured fiber diameters, supporting the practical reliability of the predictive model under real electrospinning conditions. To move beyond forward prediction, the trained XGB model was integrated with a genetic algorithm (GA) to enable surrogate-based inverse design of electrospinning parameters for user-defined target fiber diameters. The GA identified parameter combinations corresponding to target diameters between 100 nm and 4000 nm with low surrogate-model fitness errors. For target diameters of 400 nm and 600 nm, the GA achieved fitness errors of 0.03 nm and 0.35 nm, respectively. Furthermore, the integrated XGB-GA approach yielded a perfect linear correlation ( R 2 = 1.00) between the target fiber diameters and the predicted fiber diameters within the GA-optimized subset, demonstrating the effectiveness of the optimization strategy for precise diameter control across various electrospinning conditions. Overall, this study provides a data-driven approach for predicting fiber diameter and guiding electrospinning parameter selection while reducing dependence on trial-and-error experimentation within the material systems represented in the dataset. Graphical abstract

Journal of Materials ScienceVol. 61(23)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.