Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced system resilience, caused economic welfare loss, and widened disparities in healthcare access. This study aims to identify the macro-level factors contributing to COVID-19 vaccination inequity by proposing an AI-driven monitoring framework using classical statistical modelling and machine learning (ML) classifiers from a pooled dataset (WHO, World Bank, and our World in Data) covering 195 countries. Methods Daily vaccination data and national-level indicators were investigated using concentration indices, classical odds ratios across global regions and seven ML classifiers—logistic regression, naïve Bayes, decision tree, random forest, LightGBM, extra trees, and XGBoost—to identify significant predictors of vaccination inequity with higher accuracy. Results and discussion Findings show vaccine coverage remains pro-rich in Africa, North America, Europe, and Oceania, whereas Southeast Asia depicts pro-poor vaccine uptake. Capacity of health system, availability of hygiene infrastructure, prioritization of people suffering from noncommunicable diseases, and exposure to behavioral risk factors were strongly associated with pro-poor distribution of vaccine access in low-income (LIC) and lower-middle income countries (LMIC) in Asia and Africa and improves over time. Among ML models, random forest and XGBoost achieved the highest performance. As the final best model, random forest (RF) is selected with highest weighted score (98.5%), AUROC (99.9%). XGBoost is the second-best model attained the second highest weighted score (97.9%), AUROC (99.8%), and both attained good 5-fold cross validation standard deviation (0.009 for RF and 0.014 for XGBoost) allowing temporal stratification of folds. Results justify the superiority of ensemble ML models over single learners in predicting inequity in vaccine uptake. This study proves that machine learning outperforms conventional predictive analysis and more suitable for monitoring inequity in COVID-19 vaccination access to inform global health policy towards intelligent pandemic preparedness. Therefore, to reduce regional inequity in vaccine uptake, the regional-structural nonlinearities in LICs and LMICs should be adjusted through accurate and robust integration of artificial intelligence in monitoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1774077
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens

Moumita Mukherjee
Frontiers in Health Services
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Exploring the correlates of COVID-19 vaccination inequity: a global analysis using machine learning from a health economic lens

Moumita Mukherjee
article en

Abstract

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has reduced system resilience, caused economic welfare loss, and widened disparities in healthcare access. This study aims to identify the macro-level factors contributing to COVID-19 vaccination inequity by proposing an AI-driven monitoring framework using classical statistical modelling and machine learning (ML) classifiers from a pooled dataset (WHO, World Bank, and our World in Data) covering 195 countries. Methods Daily vaccination data and national-level indicators were investigated using concentration indices, classical odds ratios across global regions and seven ML classifiers—logistic regression, naïve Bayes, decision tree, random forest, LightGBM, extra trees, and XGBoost—to identify significant predictors of vaccination inequity with higher accuracy. Results and discussion Findings show vaccine coverage remains pro-rich in Africa, North America, Europe, and Oceania, whereas Southeast Asia depicts pro-poor vaccine uptake. Capacity of health system, availability of hygiene infrastructure, prioritization of people suffering from noncommunicable diseases, and exposure to behavioral risk factors were strongly associated with pro-poor distribution of vaccine access in low-income (LIC) and lower-middle income countries (LMIC) in Asia and Africa and improves over time. Among ML models, random forest and XGBoost achieved the highest performance. As the final best model, random forest (RF) is selected with highest weighted score (98.5%), AUROC (99.9%). XGBoost is the second-best model attained the second highest weighted score (97.9%), AUROC (99.8%), and both attained good 5-fold cross validation standard deviation (0.009 for RF and 0.014 for XGBoost) allowing temporal stratification of folds. Results justify the superiority of ensemble ML models over single learners in predicting inequity in vaccine uptake. This study proves that machine learning outperforms conventional predictive analysis and more suitable for monitoring inequity in COVID-19 vaccination access to inform global health policy towards intelligent pandemic preparedness. Therefore, to reduce regional inequity in vaccine uptake, the regional-structural nonlinearities in LICs and LMICs should be adjusted through accurate and robust integration of artificial intelligence in monitoring systems.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 6
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.