The impact of varying cursor latency on visuomotor tracking

The visuomotor system compensates for sensory feedback delays, enabling the integration of visual information with motor commands to track moving objects with precision. However, when latency associated with a movement outcome becomes variable or noisy, this ability to compensate is tested. We aimed to identify the thresholds at which delays disrupt tracking to understand the limits of visuomotor prediction and error correction. Participants performed a visually guided pursuit task following a target along a curvilinear path, while eye and cursor movements were recorded under various latency conditions. Cursor position was recorded throughout each trial to quantify mouse-to-cursor latency, cursor velocity, and cursor-target error. In the first study, latency was constant within trials. Six latency magnitudes (0-300 ms) were tested and their impact on tracking performance analysed. Spectral analysis of cursor velocity showed that under high latency, pursuit submovements shifted to lower frequencies interspersed with high frequency corrective actions, whereas under low latency conditions, smoother tracking dominated. In the second study, abrupt changes in cursor latency were introduced mid-trial. Step increases in latency resulted in larger positional errors and increased corrective submovements, while decreases in latency led to rapid error reduction and a return to smoother tracking. These transitions highlight the visuomotor system's ability to recalibrate in response to latency variability. Together these results show that error correction mechanisms rapidly respond to changes in latency depending on its magnitude. These results may inform the design of assistive display technologies that maintain performance under challenging conditions and increase safety in high-risk environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Brain Research
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-026-07291-0
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of varying cursor latency on visuomotor tracking

Steven D. Wiederman, Anna Ma-Wyatt, Jessica L. O’Rielly, Lucy J Turner
Experimental Brain Research
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

The impact of varying cursor latency on visuomotor tracking

Steven D. Wiederman, Anna Ma-Wyatt, Jessica L. O’Rielly, Lucy J Turner
article en

Abstract

The visuomotor system compensates for sensory feedback delays, enabling the integration of visual information with motor commands to track moving objects with precision. However, when latency associated with a movement outcome becomes variable or noisy, this ability to compensate is tested. We aimed to identify the thresholds at which delays disrupt tracking to understand the limits of visuomotor prediction and error correction. Participants performed a visually guided pursuit task following a target along a curvilinear path, while eye and cursor movements were recorded under various latency conditions. Cursor position was recorded throughout each trial to quantify mouse-to-cursor latency, cursor velocity, and cursor-target error. In the first study, latency was constant within trials. Six latency magnitudes (0-300 ms) were tested and their impact on tracking performance analysed. Spectral analysis of cursor velocity showed that under high latency, pursuit submovements shifted to lower frequencies interspersed with high frequency corrective actions, whereas under low latency conditions, smoother tracking dominated. In the second study, abrupt changes in cursor latency were introduced mid-trial. Step increases in latency resulted in larger positional errors and increased corrective submovements, while decreases in latency led to rapid error reduction and a return to smoother tracking. These transitions highlight the visuomotor system's ability to recalibrate in response to latency variability. Together these results show that error correction mechanisms rapidly respond to changes in latency depending on its magnitude. These results may inform the design of assistive display technologies that maintain performance under challenging conditions and increase safety in high-risk environments.

Experimental Brain ResearchVol. 244(6)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The impact of varying cursor latency on visuomotor tracking — Steven D. Wiederman, Anna Ma-Wyatt, et al. · Experimental Brain Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS