Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Small Surgical Bioprostheses

BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic impact of failed surgical bioprosthetic size following valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of failed bioprosthetic size and subsequent prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on midterm outcomes of ViV TAVR. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent ViV TAVR for degenerated surgical bioprostheses in the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention-transcatheter aortic valve implantation) registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the true internal diameter (ID) of bioprostheses: the small bioprosthesis (SB) group (ID ≤20 mm) and the non-small bioprosthesis (NB) group (ID >20 mm). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization at 3 years. Factors associated with severe measured PPM were also examined. RESULTS: Among 367 consecutive patients undergoing ViV TAVR (244 patients in the SB group vs 123 patients in the NB group), 30-day mortality was 0.5%. Severe PPM occurred in 16.9% of the entire cohort and was more prevalent in the SB group (21.3% in the SB group vs 8.3% in the NB group; P = 0.001). The SB group had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization at 3 years (19.1% in the SB group vs 9.8% in the NB group; adjusted HR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.11-10.87). The SB patients with severe PPM had the highest risk of the primary outcome at 3 years (SB with PPM 39.2% vs NB without PPM 11.0%; adjusted HR: 6.65 [95% CI: 1.95-22.71] compared with the NB group without PPM). Factors associated with severe PPM included larger body surface area, balloon-expandable valve implantation, and true ID ≤20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: ViV TAVR for small surgical bioprostheses was associated with worse clinical outcome, particularly in those with severe PPM. (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [OCEAN-TAVI]; UMIN000020423).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Asia
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.01.034
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Small Surgical Bioprostheses

Masahiko Noguchi, Hiroto Suzuyama, Yasushi Fuku, Hidetaka Nishina et al.
JACC Asia
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Small Surgical Bioprostheses

Masahiko Noguchi, Hiroto Suzuyama, Yasushi Fuku, Hidetaka Nishina, Norihiko Kamioka, Kenji Nishioka, Kazumasa Yamasaki, K T Takagi, Daisuke Hachinohe, Masahiro Yamawaki, Gaku Nakazawa, Yohei Ohno, Masahiko Asami, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Izumo, Norio Tada, Hiroshi Ueno, Masanori Yamamoto, Fumiaki Yashima, Yusuke Watanabe, Kentaro Hayashida, Futoshi Yamanaka, Toru Naganuma, Toshiaki Otsuka
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on the prognostic impact of failed surgical bioprosthetic size following valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain limited. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the impact of failed bioprosthetic size and subsequent prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on midterm outcomes of ViV TAVR. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent ViV TAVR for degenerated surgical bioprostheses in the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention-transcatheter aortic valve implantation) registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the true internal diameter (ID) of bioprostheses: the small bioprosthesis (SB) group (ID ≤20 mm) and the non-small bioprosthesis (NB) group (ID >20 mm). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization at 3 years. Factors associated with severe measured PPM were also examined. RESULTS: Among 367 consecutive patients undergoing ViV TAVR (244 patients in the SB group vs 123 patients in the NB group), 30-day mortality was 0.5%. Severe PPM occurred in 16.9% of the entire cohort and was more prevalent in the SB group (21.3% in the SB group vs 8.3% in the NB group; P = 0.001). The SB group had a higher risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization at 3 years (19.1% in the SB group vs 9.8% in the NB group; adjusted HR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.11-10.87). The SB patients with severe PPM had the highest risk of the primary outcome at 3 years (SB with PPM 39.2% vs NB without PPM 11.0%; adjusted HR: 6.65 [95% CI: 1.95-22.71] compared with the NB group without PPM). Factors associated with severe PPM included larger body surface area, balloon-expandable valve implantation, and true ID ≤20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: ViV TAVR for small surgical bioprostheses was associated with worse clinical outcome, particularly in those with severe PPM. (Optimized Transcatheter Valvular Intervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation [OCEAN-TAVI]; UMIN000020423).

JACC Asia
Tokai University (JP), St. Marianna University School of Medicine (JP), Keio University (JP), Tokoha Gakuen University (JP), Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP), Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital (JP), New Tokyo Hospital (JP), Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital (JP), Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital (JP), Sapporo Science Center (JP), National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP), Tokai University Hospital (JP), Saiseikai Utsunomiya hospital (JP), Toyohashi Heart Center (JP), Mitsui Memorial Hospital (JP), Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital (JP), Toyama University Hospital (JP), Shonan Kamakura General Hospital (JP), Saiseikai Yokohama Eastern Hospital (JP), Kokura Memorial Hospital (JP), Nippon Medical School (JP), Teikyo University (JP), Kindai University (JP)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.