The relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses: a cross sectional study

INTRODUCTION: In an increasingly technology-driven healthcare environment, digital literacy and clinical decision-making (CDM) are essential competencies for undergraduate nursing students. This study investigates the relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional correlational design was employed, involving a convenience sample of 201 undergraduate nursing students at Taif University, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on campus between August and September 2025 via a secure Google Forms link distributed through official university channels. Analysis included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests to examine sex differences, and Pearson's correlation and linear regression to evaluate the relationship between variables. RESULTS: = 0.151) of the variance in CDM scores. Sex differences were highly significant across both domains. Female students reported significantly higher mean digital literacy scores (51.78, SD = 7.73) compared to their male counterparts (44.97, SD = 7.89; t = -3.87, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant disparity was observed in clinical decision-making, where female students scored 172.50 (SD = 12.40) compared to 162.03 (SD = 14.15) for males (t = -3.82, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the critical role of digital literacy in clinical performance. The results suggest a need for targeted educational strategies to bridge sex-based competency gaps within nursing education. This ensures all students are prepared for a digitalized healthcare landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04724-7
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses: a cross sectional study

Mohammed Saleh Almalki
BMC Nursing
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

The relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses: a cross sectional study

Mohammed Saleh Almalki
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In an increasingly technology-driven healthcare environment, digital literacy and clinical decision-making (CDM) are essential competencies for undergraduate nursing students. This study investigates the relationship between digital literacy and clinical decision-making skills among student nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional correlational design was employed, involving a convenience sample of 201 undergraduate nursing students at Taif University, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected on campus between August and September 2025 via a secure Google Forms link distributed through official university channels. Analysis included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests to examine sex differences, and Pearson's correlation and linear regression to evaluate the relationship between variables. RESULTS: = 0.151) of the variance in CDM scores. Sex differences were highly significant across both domains. Female students reported significantly higher mean digital literacy scores (51.78, SD = 7.73) compared to their male counterparts (44.97, SD = 7.89; t = -3.87, p < 0.001). Furthermore, a significant disparity was observed in clinical decision-making, where female students scored 172.50 (SD = 12.40) compared to 162.03 (SD = 14.15) for males (t = -3.82, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings underscore the critical role of digital literacy in clinical performance. The results suggest a need for targeted educational strategies to bridge sex-based competency gaps within nursing education. This ensures all students are prepared for a digitalized healthcare landscape.

BMC Nursing
Taif University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.