Effects of remote breastfeeding guidance on breastfeeding rates and neonatal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Breastfeeding is widely acknowledged as the optimal feeding method for neonatal health. Remote breastfeeding guidance (e.g., using the telephone, text messages, mobile applications, and so on) may improve breastfeeding rates and neonatal outcomes, but its short-term impact and effect across economic regions remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of remote breastfeeding guidance on neonatal feeding practices and breastfeeding rates. Methods Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were screened from inception to November 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of remote breastfeeding guidance on breastfeeding rates and neonatal health. Time subgroup analyses evaluated exclusive and any breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months postpartum, together with the effects in developed and less developed regions. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) and sensitivity analysis were employed to address heterogeneity and evaluate the robustness of the findings. Results Thirty RCTs involving 8,389 infants were incorporated into this systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to the control group, remote breastfeeding support significantly increased the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months ( RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.23, P < 0.0001; RR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.38–1.77, P < 0.0001), with modest effects on any breastfeeding ( RR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13, P = 0.007; RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.99–1.11, P = 0.11). Infant weight was significantly higher in the intervention groups at 3 and 6 months ( MD = 334.39, 95% CI 310.93–357.85, P < 0.00001), representing clinically meaningful gains. A subgroup analysis demonstrated that exclusive breastfeeding provided greater benefits in less developed regions ( RR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.23–1.34, P < 0.00001) than in developed regions ( RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.19, P < 0.00001). TSA and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusions Remote breastfeeding guidance plays an important role in increasing breastfeeding rates and promoting physical development, with particularly pronounced effects in less developed regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1696927
Primary Topic
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of remote breastfeeding guidance on breastfeeding rates and neonatal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sang Sang, Qiqi Wei, Miaomiao Hu, Han Xiao et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
article

Effects of remote breastfeeding guidance on breastfeeding rates and neonatal health: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sang Sang, Qiqi Wei, Miaomiao Hu, Han Xiao, Ji Qi, Hui Pei, Li Wei, Jing Li
article en

Abstract

Background Breastfeeding is widely acknowledged as the optimal feeding method for neonatal health. Remote breastfeeding guidance (e.g., using the telephone, text messages, mobile applications, and so on) may improve breastfeeding rates and neonatal outcomes, but its short-term impact and effect across economic regions remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of remote breastfeeding guidance on neonatal feeding practices and breastfeeding rates. Methods Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were screened from inception to November 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of remote breastfeeding guidance on breastfeeding rates and neonatal health. Time subgroup analyses evaluated exclusive and any breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months postpartum, together with the effects in developed and less developed regions. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) and sensitivity analysis were employed to address heterogeneity and evaluate the robustness of the findings. Results Thirty RCTs involving 8,389 infants were incorporated into this systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to the control group, remote breastfeeding support significantly increased the prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months ( RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11–1.23, P < 0.0001; RR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.38–1.77, P < 0.0001), with modest effects on any breastfeeding ( RR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13, P = 0.007; RR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.99–1.11, P = 0.11). Infant weight was significantly higher in the intervention groups at 3 and 6 months ( MD = 334.39, 95% CI 310.93–357.85, P < 0.00001), representing clinically meaningful gains. A subgroup analysis demonstrated that exclusive breastfeeding provided greater benefits in less developed regions ( RR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.23–1.34, P < 0.00001) than in developed regions ( RR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.05–1.19, P < 0.00001). TSA and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusions Remote breastfeeding guidance plays an important role in increasing breastfeeding rates and promoting physical development, with particularly pronounced effects in less developed regions.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Taishan Medical University (CN), Heze Municipal Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.